In Tempest and the New World include ways representing of the island along with its inhabitants (Feinberg). There are incidents of European with Indigenous people in the New World with several misunderstandings being created along with injustice and conflicts. There are imaginations that excite which reflects starting of a new society that is more fair and equitable in nature. There are certain opportunities and certain challenges that are represented in ideas of New World through the play’s portrayal. The scope of this analysis deals with Prospero, the main character of the play being good or bad. In order to analyse true nature and character of Prospero, various instances form the play needs to be evaluated. Several critics have their own view regarding Prospero and also analyses reason as to why he is seen in such a way.
Analysis
Prospero can be seen as a protagonist of Tempest by Shakespeare, understanding can reveal understanding regarding its good or evil characteristics. Prospero plays a key role in the play, which is the reason for such scrutiny regarding the role (Brevik). There are several confusion in the character of Prospero as he takes control and in-charge of the island. Prospero has two sides of his character consisting of one compassionate side where he is seen to help everyone for making the island a better place. Prospero being a learned and educated person is able to take control and direct the island. In the dark side of his character he is seen to torment people, this evil …show more content…
The complex character of Prospero cannot be pinned to a single dimension. He is seen to have many depiction of his character in a contrasting nature. At one side of his character a good nature is revealed whereas on the other side evil nature of his characteristics is revealed. He makes use of people to get results at the end which he