They also petitioned that there was no effort put forth to show the betterment of the child by placing him back with his birth mother, and was in the best interest of the child’s development that he stayed with the adoptive parents. As well as, “the interlocutory order could not be set aside simply because the consenting natural mother had changed her mind.” Bidwell V. McSorely. 194 Va. 135, 72 S.E.2d 245 (1952). The Virginia Supreme Court agreed with the appeal, reversing the order of the trial court and reinstated the interlocutory order of adoption. Now with the background of the case it will discuss how it relates to the final paper for the course, as well as why it is important and what problems may come from using this case as a primary
They also petitioned that there was no effort put forth to show the betterment of the child by placing him back with his birth mother, and was in the best interest of the child’s development that he stayed with the adoptive parents. As well as, “the interlocutory order could not be set aside simply because the consenting natural mother had changed her mind.” Bidwell V. McSorely. 194 Va. 135, 72 S.E.2d 245 (1952). The Virginia Supreme Court agreed with the appeal, reversing the order of the trial court and reinstated the interlocutory order of adoption. Now with the background of the case it will discuss how it relates to the final paper for the course, as well as why it is important and what problems may come from using this case as a primary