Because evolution is taught as “science,” many view the truth of Creation as a religious fantasy that is not scientific. However, tracing the roots of evolution back to Charles Darwin reveals much about the idea. In the year 1831 Darwin embarked on a five-year voyage on the H.M.S. Beagle as part of an expedition to the surrounding areas of South America and islands in the Pacific. During this journey he observed many new animals, geological formations, and plants, all the while taking copious notes and keeping in mind the idea of uniformitarianism (the present is the key to the past). He published his book The Origin of Species in 1859, detailing his theories concerning the origin of life in respect to the things he had observed throughout his voyage. It is interesting to note that this book was published more than twenty years after his trip and simply included his speculations about how the earth came to be. It was in no way a certified scientific hypothesis and many scientists immediately rejected the theory when it was first …show more content…
Natural selection is the idea that the healthiest and strongest of each species have a better chance of survival than their weaker counterparts: survival of the fittest. While this idea is true to some degree, Darwin greatly misunderstood the concept. He ignored the fact that variety within kinds has established limits that cannot be surpassed; for example, reptiles exhibit much variety within their kind, but it is impossible that a reptile be transformed into a bird. This is true because natural selection acts to maintain the survival of already existing species, not create new ones. From a scientific standpoint it is a ridiculous leap of logic; from a Biblical standpoint it is a flagrant rejection of the truths concerning God's