They believed that they were the "fittest" race, because they developed technology and conquered large parts of the world. White imperialists saw Black, Indian and Aborigine races as an inferior race. However, in contrast to this, Herbert Spencer, a social scientists used Charles Darwin's theory of survival of the fittest on humans, whilst the theory was implied on plants and animals. And the generation of the late 19th and 20th centuries didn't ever question what Charles Darwin wrote and said. However, it wasn't a generation like they why generation, where things are questioned and challenged. Therefore, despite Herbert Spencer implication of survival of the fittest on humans and the generations of the late 19th and early 20th centuries failure to question and challenge things, Charles Darwin's theories of evolution didn't contributed to the development of racial attitudes, that white imperialists adopted to justify colonisation, power and privilege in the late 19th and 20th centuries. It was Social
They believed that they were the "fittest" race, because they developed technology and conquered large parts of the world. White imperialists saw Black, Indian and Aborigine races as an inferior race. However, in contrast to this, Herbert Spencer, a social scientists used Charles Darwin's theory of survival of the fittest on humans, whilst the theory was implied on plants and animals. And the generation of the late 19th and 20th centuries didn't ever question what Charles Darwin wrote and said. However, it wasn't a generation like they why generation, where things are questioned and challenged. Therefore, despite Herbert Spencer implication of survival of the fittest on humans and the generations of the late 19th and early 20th centuries failure to question and challenge things, Charles Darwin's theories of evolution didn't contributed to the development of racial attitudes, that white imperialists adopted to justify colonisation, power and privilege in the late 19th and 20th centuries. It was Social