In addition, this theory resonated with me because of its lack of structure, which is often a cited as a weakness. Ross’s prima facie duties are not absolute; therefore, contradictions are not relevant and duties are not always morally decisive. There are situations in which it is acceptable to leave some prima facie unfulfilled at the cost of others. For example, Bob has two friends: Sally and Tom. Bob and Sally have been friends since childhood and Tom joined the group in high school. Tom physically assaults Sally and Bob sees it happen. Bob knows reporting Tom would violate both fidelity (trust between friends) and non-maleficence (would harm his future and well-being). Bob tells on Tom regardless and remains a moral person even though he violated a duty. How? Based on prima facie, the situation called for Bob to prioritize Justice over fidelity and
In addition, this theory resonated with me because of its lack of structure, which is often a cited as a weakness. Ross’s prima facie duties are not absolute; therefore, contradictions are not relevant and duties are not always morally decisive. There are situations in which it is acceptable to leave some prima facie unfulfilled at the cost of others. For example, Bob has two friends: Sally and Tom. Bob and Sally have been friends since childhood and Tom joined the group in high school. Tom physically assaults Sally and Bob sees it happen. Bob knows reporting Tom would violate both fidelity (trust between friends) and non-maleficence (would harm his future and well-being). Bob tells on Tom regardless and remains a moral person even though he violated a duty. How? Based on prima facie, the situation called for Bob to prioritize Justice over fidelity and