Table No. 1: Details of respondents’ analysis towards measuring of execution after training.
Measuring of Execution after training Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 50% 161 33.3 33.3 33.3 25% 322 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 483 100.0 100.0
Source: Field Survey
INTERPRETATION: The above table no. 1 attempts to conclude that, 33.3% of the respondents opined with regard to measuring of evaluation after training program that 50% of the employees feel satisfactory in the IT sector, 66.7% of the respondents opined to 25% as good towards the measuring of training program after pre and post training. In summarization, 66.7% of the respondents have an unsatisfactory opinion towards the method …show more content…
Overall satisfaction towards T & D programs organized in IT sector:
Table No. 3: Details of respondents’ analysis towards overall satisfaction towards T & D programs.
Overall satisfaction towards T & D programs organized in IT Sector Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative …show more content…
It is crucial to develop, deliver and evaluate training activities based on the expectation of the organization. The fundamental intention of training is to develop and deliver training for the competence of the employees and therefore evaluating and examining the training and development program is but a basic necessity. By doing this exercise only the rationale of training is established and that is training is not the cost but is an investment. Therefore to prove this point measuring, examining, and evaluation is required and is a must. As a consequence, this leads to finding out the impact on the organizational