Louis Hockey Club L.P. listed as the defendant. I was perplexed why and how an entity, that wasn’t directly involved in the game, could be seen as liable for injuries that occur in the aforementioned game. I still had difficulties understanding this concept when I learned that the club of the player who caused the injury, the Peoria Rivermen, is a subsidiary of the defendant. I wondered why the Rivermen club itself wasn’t listed as the defendant. A month on, I now understand why the St. Louis Hockey Club L.P, was the defendant of the case. Since they were the entity that owned the injuring players club, who are just a subsidiary of a larger organization, they would have to be the entity that would be held responsible in the event of a negligent act by an employee representing their
Louis Hockey Club L.P. listed as the defendant. I was perplexed why and how an entity, that wasn’t directly involved in the game, could be seen as liable for injuries that occur in the aforementioned game. I still had difficulties understanding this concept when I learned that the club of the player who caused the injury, the Peoria Rivermen, is a subsidiary of the defendant. I wondered why the Rivermen club itself wasn’t listed as the defendant. A month on, I now understand why the St. Louis Hockey Club L.P, was the defendant of the case. Since they were the entity that owned the injuring players club, who are just a subsidiary of a larger organization, they would have to be the entity that would be held responsible in the event of a negligent act by an employee representing their