Expectations about the performance initially were all over in the sky, since in no other performance around that time frame was solely classical. I expected something like Lizst, Bethoveen or some romantic-classical well-known music. Because of the poster on the school website and the email notifications were simple and short, audiences did not even fill the half of the seats of Studio 312. The recital had a some of the unfamiliar classic performers' works such as Brahms, Turina, Scriabin. The players have put in so much time and effort to smoothen the intermission and transition within and between the musical pieces. The compositions are so well played, that slow-paced portion in the duo and some inconsistent arrangement of parts of music were not even noticed by many. Unlike the audiences of other performances, most of the audiences of the recital were young. Perhaps this shows that classics still have a long way to move the shadows of some new genres like Kpop, pop, or …show more content…
Watching and listening to the musical performance gives fuller satisfaction and joy than merely listening to it. The most memorable part was that player’s expert level piano skills surprised every one of the audiences, the first time among all five concerts I've been this year, audience congratulated with a bouquet. The last two musicals of this recital, Rachmaninoff's Prelude, and Scriabin’s Etude were like an earworm just kept hearing them even after next day of the performance. I tried to search and learn the pieces, but it turns out that that musical pieces are extremely hard to play. Rachmaninoff’s is more like two mixers stroking the piano keys rather than fingers, extremely fast tempted. In the other hand, the Scriabin’s style is relatively slower paced long stretched chords than the Rachmaninoff's. Also, my prejudice against particular classical kinds of music changed. Music pieces are so well constructed that I probably never able to look at the equally well-formed Beethoven's