ideological perspective of internationalism. The source is opposing another form of nationalism
since it starts off by comparing internationalism with another term by stating “on the contrary”,
and this implies that the author is against nationalism because he is not in favour of its “one-
sided” (ness) and how it is controlled by showing only one opinion or point of view without the
consideration of others. He believes that internationalism “by its very name” (internationalism)
gives other nations recognition and does not pretend that other nations do not exist.
Nationalism and internationalism stand in opposition to each other because they emphasize
different aspects since nationalism …show more content…
This source also
supports the fact that although internationalism “limits their scope” and restricts the extent of
subject matter, it is still beneficial because it is non-partial unlike nationalism.
Source 2 is a cartoon that discourages the principles of nationalism and shines the light
on self-absorbed nations who do nothing but embezzle their services rather than giving them
out to individuals who need it the most, and the source also focuses on and criticizes
nationalism in a way that the selfish countries that are being cross-examined here only promote
the interest of one’s state or people above all others. The aspect of nationalism that is being
opposed here is the feeling that people have of their country that comes with the belief that
the country is better and more important than others, while it is important for those selfish
countries to abolish that childish idiosyncrasy in order to take action and make