They then continued with asking that the state forbid the district attorney from prosecuting any other women under the same law (Roe vs. Wade, 2011). After the review of the case and to the surprise of many, the judge panel ruled to the favor of McCorvey. Their analysis on the case stated that the law did violate her constitutional rights to privacy. Following the case, the court ruled that the ninth and fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution guaranteed privacy rights that were large enough to protect a women 's rights to having an abortion. Although the first request was granted the second was not as easy. McCorvey and her attorneys appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court about refusal to forbid future prosecutions for abortion; Wade also appealed the
They then continued with asking that the state forbid the district attorney from prosecuting any other women under the same law (Roe vs. Wade, 2011). After the review of the case and to the surprise of many, the judge panel ruled to the favor of McCorvey. Their analysis on the case stated that the law did violate her constitutional rights to privacy. Following the case, the court ruled that the ninth and fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution guaranteed privacy rights that were large enough to protect a women 's rights to having an abortion. Although the first request was granted the second was not as easy. McCorvey and her attorneys appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court about refusal to forbid future prosecutions for abortion; Wade also appealed the