Diehards argues, “the cost of capital punishment” is extremely high. He believes that having capital punishment around is one sided and also too expensive. The average officer's employment rate decreases for every capital punishment case that increases per person. While the death penalty being one of the most costly state laws.The law doesn't contribute in any aspect of financial support towards society. In argument with Kent Scheidegger, Diehards states, “Spending millions of dollars on a single capital case, the average police budget had to be cut by 7 percent this year.” Using persuasive methods Diehards argues his point with a few explanations. Throughout his small statements he provides many logical facts towards law enforcement officer's budgets. The layoff of many employed officer's increases the income for capital
Diehards argues, “the cost of capital punishment” is extremely high. He believes that having capital punishment around is one sided and also too expensive. The average officer's employment rate decreases for every capital punishment case that increases per person. While the death penalty being one of the most costly state laws.The law doesn't contribute in any aspect of financial support towards society. In argument with Kent Scheidegger, Diehards states, “Spending millions of dollars on a single capital case, the average police budget had to be cut by 7 percent this year.” Using persuasive methods Diehards argues his point with a few explanations. Throughout his small statements he provides many logical facts towards law enforcement officer's budgets. The layoff of many employed officer's increases the income for capital