When Gawain is preparing to leave on his quest the narrator begins to describe to us his shield, “that was of shining gules, with the pentangle painted there in pure gold hues”. The pentangle, readers later learn, is a symbol of Gawain’s noble knightliness and truthfulness. This is another example of social class dressing. Had Gawain not been a knight of as high esteem, he most likely wouldn’t have had a shield laden in pure gold. The pentangles depiction as well as the gold used to paint it serve no purpose or function when it comes to protection, only as a display of Gawain’s social …show more content…
This is a powerful finding but begs the question, are you really making an impression or are you trying to directly affect people’s perception of you? In the instance of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight I think it can be argued that Sir Gawain is trying to directly affect the way the outside world sees him and his association with King Arthur’s court. Without the pentangle Sir Gawain’s shield would be no different than your average knights shield. However, because the pentangle is a symbol of courage, pride, and respect this distinguishes Gawain. Then when the pentangle is depicted painted in gold readers see another display of Gawain’s social class. In the time of knights gold was just as uncommon as it is today, and to have something made from or designed in pure gold would cost a pretty penny, so to speak. When commoners would see Sir Gawain’s shield with the golden pentangle it would imply to them that he is of higher standing and should be treated with respect and honor. This illustration would instantly affect the way others viewed and treated Gawain, however, who’s to say a lower status farmer could not spend his life savings on a shield and armor that look the same as Sir Gawain’s? If the farmer did and entered a town where he was unknown, what would