However, in trying to maintain pure objectivity, Sanneh becomes complicated and confusing. For lack of a better term, all over the place. He perfectly describes the events that took place and the statements that people provided from both sides of the debate, liberal and illiberal. Yet he fails to remain coherent in his findings or make an argument for either side which leaves the reader having to read it multiple times to properly interpret the
However, in trying to maintain pure objectivity, Sanneh becomes complicated and confusing. For lack of a better term, all over the place. He perfectly describes the events that took place and the statements that people provided from both sides of the debate, liberal and illiberal. Yet he fails to remain coherent in his findings or make an argument for either side which leaves the reader having to read it multiple times to properly interpret the