A serious American contemporary issue is the use of the insanity defense. The insanity defense is when a person being accused of a crime are legally sane but were not in the right state of mind when the crime had taken place. The insanity defense is a chance to help the person who was not in the normal state of mind. This defense is a compromise of society and law because not all mental ailments can be proven or disproven. The benefits of the insanity defense include rehabilitation, preservation of life and finding out if the person is a real criminal or not.
A common misconception that citizen’s think about the insanity defense is that it is being overused. Citizens think the insanity defense is used for criminals to …show more content…
The Durham rule was made to be a simple rule or test to remove the M’Naughten Rule. The Durham rule states a person cannot be convicted of a crime if the act was in correlation to a mental disorder. Does not require a medical diagnosis. However, this now requires to have expert testimony. West 's Encyclopedia of American Law, explains the Durham rule, “an accused is not criminally responsible if his unlawful act was the product of mental disease." It required a jury 's determination that the accused was suffering from a mental disease and that there was a causal relationship between the disease and the act.”
The "Irresistible Impulse" Test came after the M’Naughten rule. This does not only test cognitive, but how well one can resist impulse. To prove the impulse test is to first identify if there is mental illness, then to see if the mental illness caused the lack to control or actions to conform to law and society. This test can help the court consider who needs help or if it just an ordinary criminal. If a person is legally sane, that person should be able to maintain control unless there is an underlying issue. To test the impulse is just to get a feel and to know how that person …show more content…
IDRA replaced the ALI test, so that it will make it harder for a person to obtain a verdict of not guilty on by reason of insanity (NGRI). “Congress passed and the president signed into law the Insanity Defense Reform Act (IDRA) of 1984. Legally, this new insanity defense test replaces the American Law Institute 's test (ALI, 1962), in federal jurisdictions. Substantively, Congress chose to lop off the volitional prong of ALI, leaving only the cognitive prong, which is itself a semantic restatement of the M 'Naghten rule” (Finkel 1). Although the Insanity defense is questioned and has negative views, it is a very helpful defense for those who are sane, but commited a crime.The insanity defense helps preserve life and gives second chances. Citizens need to understand that there are many laws in place to help this denfense only to be used when necessary. The insanity defense is a plea that helps figure out the real criminal versus humans who need help and rehabilitation. Delusion is irrelevant and so is any form of intoxication and most citizens do not realize that. Statistics have proven the use and effectiveness of this