The stricter limitations and differential treatments for the commercial speech are due to its more completed social status and broader social influence at some times than an individual’s words. According to the Central Husdon case, “the protection available for particular commercial expression turns on the nature both of expression and of the governmental interests served by its regulation.” In other words, government has the right to regulate the lawful and correct commercial speech only if it passed the Central Husdon test (Florida Bar, Pruette), which requires that government interests are substantial, the speech directly violates government’s substantial interest, and the government’s regulations for speech fit the government’s original purposes. All of these factors need to be satisfied in order to confirm that TPAA’s policy is
The stricter limitations and differential treatments for the commercial speech are due to its more completed social status and broader social influence at some times than an individual’s words. According to the Central Husdon case, “the protection available for particular commercial expression turns on the nature both of expression and of the governmental interests served by its regulation.” In other words, government has the right to regulate the lawful and correct commercial speech only if it passed the Central Husdon test (Florida Bar, Pruette), which requires that government interests are substantial, the speech directly violates government’s substantial interest, and the government’s regulations for speech fit the government’s original purposes. All of these factors need to be satisfied in order to confirm that TPAA’s policy is