In regards to SES, in the U.S. there is a little argument that minority groups have a stronghold on lower SES populations. By using the low SES of minority groups as examples in the chapter I was unclear whether there were disadvantages in aging because of the SES, cultures, or ethnicity. Should future research investigate these variables individually? What are some of the challenges that developmental scientists will face if they try to apply the Life-course model globally? the Life-course theory appears to follow the Nurture model very closely, but there does not appear to be any direct link in the literature to Life-course being an advocate or example of the nurture theory. nurture being the more influence. Is there enough information to conclude that Life-course theorist are Nurture advocates? If so, should Life-course be categorized as a nurture theory as well as a macro
In regards to SES, in the U.S. there is a little argument that minority groups have a stronghold on lower SES populations. By using the low SES of minority groups as examples in the chapter I was unclear whether there were disadvantages in aging because of the SES, cultures, or ethnicity. Should future research investigate these variables individually? What are some of the challenges that developmental scientists will face if they try to apply the Life-course model globally? the Life-course theory appears to follow the Nurture model very closely, but there does not appear to be any direct link in the literature to Life-course being an advocate or example of the nurture theory. nurture being the more influence. Is there enough information to conclude that Life-course theorist are Nurture advocates? If so, should Life-course be categorized as a nurture theory as well as a macro