Our data explanation for tank #1 didn’t support my predication because the CO2 level was decreased from 1.5 to 1 and the O2 level decreased from 7.6 to 0.1 We predicted there would be no cellular respiration or photosynthesis levels, and our results proved there was a decrease in both. This could be explained by the bacteria in the water using CO2 and O2. The data for aquarium #3 was also not supported. For tank #3 the data wasn’t supported from the predication because CO2 increased from 3 to 7.1 and the O2 decreased from 8 to 0.5. We predicted there would be greater photosynthesis levels than cellular respiration but our results were the opposite. This means the plants were respiring at a greater rate than they were photosynthesizing. My data for aquarium #2 was supported. In tank #2 our predication was supported because our CO2 was increased from 5 to 5.8 and the O2 was decreased from 7.2 from 0.1. I predicted that there would be more cellular respiration, and in the graph it was 16 % cellular respiration and -98.61% photosynthesis. My data in aquarium #4 was supported because for aquarium #4 my prediction was that photosynthesis and cellular respiration would be equal energy, because in the graph my percentages were equal numbers for CO2 and O2. Also, tank #4 was supported from my prediction even though O2 is 0.1 higher than CO2; it still has equal energy. My data in aquarium #5 was supported because CO2 and O2 decreases
Our data explanation for tank #1 didn’t support my predication because the CO2 level was decreased from 1.5 to 1 and the O2 level decreased from 7.6 to 0.1 We predicted there would be no cellular respiration or photosynthesis levels, and our results proved there was a decrease in both. This could be explained by the bacteria in the water using CO2 and O2. The data for aquarium #3 was also not supported. For tank #3 the data wasn’t supported from the predication because CO2 increased from 3 to 7.1 and the O2 decreased from 8 to 0.5. We predicted there would be greater photosynthesis levels than cellular respiration but our results were the opposite. This means the plants were respiring at a greater rate than they were photosynthesizing. My data for aquarium #2 was supported. In tank #2 our predication was supported because our CO2 was increased from 5 to 5.8 and the O2 was decreased from 7.2 from 0.1. I predicted that there would be more cellular respiration, and in the graph it was 16 % cellular respiration and -98.61% photosynthesis. My data in aquarium #4 was supported because for aquarium #4 my prediction was that photosynthesis and cellular respiration would be equal energy, because in the graph my percentages were equal numbers for CO2 and O2. Also, tank #4 was supported from my prediction even though O2 is 0.1 higher than CO2; it still has equal energy. My data in aquarium #5 was supported because CO2 and O2 decreases