Atomic Bombs: A Case Study Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki

Great Essays
This paper will describe events that led to the decision to drop atomic bombs on cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and analyze its consequences in the context of Robert J. Aumann’s award-winning work on conflict and cooperation through game theory analysis. “There is no conflict like War and no cooperation like Peace.” The use of atomic weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki introduced the world to a nuclear weapon race that evolved into a game, in which mutual distraction was at stake. Due to a number of reasons, Japan was chosen to be the testing area for the weapon used in the game.
In 1931, one of the Japan’s original motivations to go to war in Manchuria, was its attempt to concur territories that could provide its large population with stable
…show more content…
Kamikaze pilots maximized the damage that a single plane could bring. After an airplane ran out of bombs and bullets, pilot’s last mission was to turn into a target-seeking torpedo and crush into enemies’ forces. As this crushes were intentional, they usually caused much more destruction than bombs. One successful kamikaze was able to sink the whole U.S. battle ship after damaging a couple of other ships with bombs and …show more content…
United States’ military leadership, chaired by the newly elected president Truman saw a number of opportunities in this outcome. United States’ nuclear program, which entered active development phase after the bombing of Pearl Harbor in 1941, achieved significant results and needed testing. Scientists saw how atomic bombs worked in the desert of Los Alamos, they needed to see how the explosion would affect city area and its habitats. Another reason to use atomic bombs on Japan, was to accelerate its surrender and conclude the war. Such an abrupt ending of the war would minimize American casualties and demonstrate to the rest of the world the power of the new weapon. It would also allow United States to finish the war, before Soviet Union got involved. Thus, USSR would not acquire rights to claim any of the Japanese

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Hiroshima Bombing Dbq

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In the document we have a scientist by the name of Karl T. Compton that after the bombing of Japan had gone to see the state of post war Japan. He was there for the main reason to see the atomic bombs effects, and to see if it should have been used in the first place. On one hand if the U.S. had not used the bombs then an invasion would to have to occur which would mean lots of casualties on both sides just to invade, and not including the take over. Aslo if the Allies had invaded and then Japan surrendered the people would not have, and they would have probably kept on fighting. Even then the atomic bombs still was a minor deterrent to some Japanese escape to the ones far from the bombed cities.…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While Hasegawa acknowledges that while the “Hiroshima bombing did not significantly change Japan’s policy, though it did inject a sense of urgency into the peace party’s initiative to end the war.” Though the use of bombs did hurt Japan, they still had the help provided from the Moscow mediation and even began the use of Kamikaze attacks. The Kamikaze attacks demonstrated that the “Japanese hard-liners” were willing to sacrifice themselves and take whatever means necessary to harm the enemy and retain their dictatorship regime. Hasegawa uses these facts to provide realistic outcomes and demonstrate that as long as Japan had leverage and the ability to keep their emperor they were going to continue with the war by whatever means…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are several reasons the atomic bomb was necessary to use against Japan towards the end of the Pacific War / World War II. The first most obvious reason was retaliation against Japan’s surprise attack on the United States Naval Base Pearl Harbor on December 7th, 1941. The bombing of Pearl Harbor left the United States with over 2,400 military casualties and 20 destroyed or damaged ships. The attack on Pearl Harbor was one of the sole reasons the United States had declared war on Japan. With the war with Japan still raging on by 1945, United States began closing in on the homeland of Japan.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    " On the other hand, the United States’ decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was a military measure to ensure that Japan would fully surrender. In Document H titled, Radio Address, Harry S Truman, President Truman stated, “We have used it in order to shorten the agony of war, in order to save the lives of thousands and thousands of young Americans.” He stated that the U.S had used the atomic bombs to end the war quickly and to save more American lives. However, as said by General HH Arnold, the Japanese were already on the verge of collapse.” This meant that even if the bombs weren’t used, then Japan still would have…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The bomb saved lives, also the Interim Committee supported President Truman, and Japan were given warnings to surrender. The nuclear weapon was used to save American lives. American lives were in danger as well as American soil. The Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor, moreover killing over 2,000 Americans.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During WWII there was one major discovery that not only changed history then, but also continues to change how wars are fought to this day. Yes, this discovery was the atomic bomb. Harry Truemen is credited with saying, “It’s (referring to the atomic bomb) production and its use were not lightly undertaken by this government.” To the general public this might seem like a typical wartime statement. He goes on (in document H) to say that since we had the technology we used it to decimate Japan and stop them from attacking the U.S, but is that all the bomb was used for?…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was an average, hot day in Hiroshima on August 6, 1945. Home to the Japanese army’s Second General Headquarters, yet also home to 280,000 civilians, 43,000 military personnel, and 20,000 Korean forced laborers (Gray, Paul, and Kunii). Everything had been running accordingly, adults going to their jobs, school children assisting in the cleaning of the streets, until they saw a foreign object, hurling at them at a fast speed. It exploded before anyone had the chance to choke out the work ‘bomb’, leaving the menace behind the death trap, President Truman,a villain to Japan. The Japanese had attacked multiple places before the bombing occurred, including cities such as Shanghai, Manchuria, and most famously, Pearl Harbor.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb DBQ Essay

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The use of the Atomic Bomb was both necessary and justified as it immediately ended World War II, solidified the United States as a superpower, and contained the germinating powers of Japan and Russia. The use of the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki immediately ended World War II and stopped the continuation of catastrophic and widespread violence in Japan. The Japanese had an audacious outlook on their offense throughout the duration of the war. It was suggested by Admiral William E. Leahy that, “The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender”(Source 2).…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The invasion of Iwo Jima and Okinawa resulted in severe casualties, yet the Allies heard no talk of negotiations. Joseph C.Grew, who was the former Ambassador to Japan believed, through ‘intimate experience with the Japanese thinking and psychology over an extensive period’18 that regardless of military defeat, it would be highly unlikely that Japan would of their own initiative surrender. Additionally, Historian Barton Bernstein wrote ‘ no one who looks at intransigence of the Japanese militarists should have full confidence in any other strategy (apart from the A bomb), 19which affirms Truman’s decision that it was necessary in order to bring the war to a quick end. Furthermore, The American public was overwhelmingly behind the atomic bombing of Japan, with the bomb receiving an 85% approval 20rating, proving that within the context of the disaster, it was not considered to be as controversial as it is with the power of hindsight.…

    • 2487 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Considering the immediate and long- lasting effects of the Atomic Bomb, President Truman and the United States were justified in using the nuclear weapon to force the Japanese to surrender. To illustrate, the USA was justified for using the atomic bomb starting from the bombing of Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, in which the US fleet were nearly wiped out. Moreover, 1700 people were wounded, 21 ships and 8 battleships were destroyed. Due to the attack from Japan, the USA was no longer an isolationist and now started to fight in the war. The next battle was the Battle at Midway, where the Japanese had been taking island after island between Asia and the US.…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jus In Bello Analysis

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The principles of jus ad bellum (“justice of war”) and jus in bello (“justice in war”) are the fundamental principles of the Just War Theory, which is the military ethical doctrine that justifies the reasons and methods of war. Each principle has a set of criteria that must be met in order for the act of war and conduct in war to be considered morally justifiable. Ethicists and historians question whether the use of the nuclear bombs in Japan met the necessary and reasonable criteria of the jus ad bellum principle as well as the discrimination and proportionality criteria of jus in bello. As nuclear proliferation continues to be one of the greatest threats to international security, President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Teetering to Surrender: A Critical Analysis of “The Shock of the Atomic Bomb and Japan’s Decision to Surrender— A Reconsideration” Individuals see “The Shock of the Atomic Bomb and Japan’s Decision to Surrender— A Reconsideration,” by Sadao Asada, as tedious and boring. Including names of different articles and historians can seem useless and insignificant, however I challenge you to see the strengths within this piece. Asada’s academic article puts entertainment and emotional appeal aside to discuss a different side of the Hiroshima bombing then previously emphasized, due to new information. As a result, Asada’s factual article presents a convincing case: the atomic bombs and Russian pressure were both necessary for Japan to finally surrender,…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Importance

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In president Truman’s perspective, the adamant refusal of the Japanese Emperor to surrender was a major rational for using the bomb to end the war and the ongoing deaths of millions of soldiers and civilians: “The target will be a purely military one and will issue a warning statement asking the Japs to surrender and save lives” (Truman 57). In this hope, President Truman was cynical about the reaction of the Emperor to accede this solution: “I’m sure they will not do that, but we will have given them the chance” (Truman 57). Politically, the American government was very concerned about the reluctance of the Japanese emperor to end the war, especially with the threat of the an atomic bomb being dropped on Japanese cities. In this context, Truman and military and scientific advisors were convinced that dropping the bomb would be a necessity given the adamant refusal to surrender by the Japanese government.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Was the U.S justified in dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the Second World War? Discuss the benefits and costs that it resulted.” 1. Introduction During World War Two, the U.S dropped two atomic bombs on the cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki, causing high death rates upon the Japanese. Many people may argue that the bombings were devastating and have had a dreadful effect on people’s lives.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Roughly seventy years ago marked the explosion of the nuclear bombs dropped over the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The merciless bombs were dropped on August 6, 1945, by an American officer in the U.S Air Force by the name of Charles W. Sweeney, on a Booing B-29 Superfortress bomber plane during the final stages of World War II (1939-1945). The mid nineteen forty 's was without a doubt a staggering time for the Japanese nation; this was a period loaded with resentment and anger as they glimpsed a massive nuclear bomb headed straight to them as a B-29 bomber fled the scene after destroying almost their entire city. According to an online historical article provided by the history channel titled “Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki”, the impact wiped out nearly 90 percent of the city and killed over 80,000 people instantly before the bomb had even hit the ground; a few thousand later then died because of the immense amount of radiation after affect the bomb…

    • 1322 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays