Picture this: A male forensic scientist just received a call to examine a crime scene with a dead body, possible homicide. At arrival, he discovered variations of individual evidence—some of which included multiple sets of latent fingerprints and a blood spatters—that could lead to a possible suspect or even the culprit responsible. Immediately, the forensic specialist begins to powder, lift, and collect the evidence. Considering the value of the individual evidence found—as D. P. Lyle stated in Forensic for Dummies was the “narrow down of evidence to a single, individual source,”—how great of an impact could those fingerprints and deoxyribonucleic acid filled blood spatters have on the arising case?
A single fingerprint is one of the most
A single fingerprint is one of the most