Brutus Eulogy Analysis

Improved Essays
I created a eulogy that I believe Cassius would deliver for Brutus at his funeral.
I made Cassius’ goal in the eulogy to redeem Brutus’ honor, while showcasing the relationship of the two. At the end of Cassius and Brutus’ fight, Cassius exclaims how he cannot have “too much of Brutus love, ” which I feel describes the tone for their friendship (4.3.162). Despite Cassius’ flaws and schemes, he holds Brutus as close as his brother, which is why I repeated “Oh! How Cassius hath lost a brother today” throughout the eulogy. Shakespeare created Brutus and Cassius as foils, highlighting Cassius’ proclivity for emotions and Brutus’s preference for reason. As revealed in the speech, “[Cassius’] emotions [would] patter on [his] door, but Brutus’/Would

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Can death be dignified? Is death the only thing that can be dignified? There are three tragedies that deal with the concept of dignified death and what makes it dignified. In the Greek tragedy Antigone by Sophocles, King Creon indirectly causes the deaths of many because he selfishly keeps a girl from honoring her dead brother. In the tragedy Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Brutus kills his best friend for the good of the majority.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus says, “And let us bathe our hands in Caesar’s blood up to the elbows, and besmear our swords.” (II, i, 117-122). The people of Rome look up to Brutus to save them from Caesar’s tyranny. Brutus does not realize that Cassius is just using him so that Cassius reaches his private goal of killing Caesar. Brutus is still yet confused as to why Cassius has such negative feeling about Caesar.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Caesar's blood has been shed and is evident all over Brutus as he argues with the townspeople that it was the best thing to do for Rome. Funerals are generally a time of remorse but Brutus cares to show none for what he has done. He persuades the townspeople at Caesar’s funeral and says a speech about how Caesar was too ambitious and would have corrupted Rome to justify his acts. The Roman people are convinced about what Brutus said then get the wrong impression of what his speech is about and suggest Brutus should be the new leader of Rome. Before his speech could continue Marc Antony, a close friend of Caesar, took over and started talking about Caesar.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of Brutus and Antony as foils, specifically in the speech scene, highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each. The situations that highlight the contrasting qualities of Brutus and Antony the most are the funeral speeches each gives after the assassination. The juxtaposition of the two styles amplifies the foil nature of their relationship. Brutus takes a logical, sensible approach to convincing the masses that his actions were justified.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Antony uses logos to show the plebeians believe him because he knew Caesar the best and discredit Brutus. In his speech, Antony says that “[Caesar] was [his] friend, faithful and just to [him]” (Shakespeare 3.2.94). Antony is trying to prove to the crowd that he knew Caesar better than Brutus. Antony is telling the people that he is more credible than Brutus because Caesar was his friend. In his speech Brutus says Caesar was ambitious but in his speech, Antony says “I thrice presented him a kingly crown, which he thrice refused” (Shakespeare 3.2.105).…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Brutus may seem especially straightforward with his nobility at times; however, there is much more to him than meets the eye. For example, in one scene in which Cassius notices that Brutus has not been acting like himself, and in which he ask what troubles him, Brutus responds with, “Cassius, / Be not deceived: if I have veil'd my look, (…) Vexed I am / Of late with passions of some difference, / Conceptions only proper to myself, / Which give some soil perhaps to my behaviors; / But let not therefore my good friends be grieved-- / Among which number, Cassius, be you one” (I.ii.124-135). Although Brutus did mention that he has been troubled of the late, he also says that he will be fine, and bids that Cassius be not troubled with it. In this very manner, Brutus is shielding his true thoughts and emotions from Cassius, and can be as a result described as stoic.…

    • 1700 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The mental positions that Brutus stimulates in his remarks towards himself while speaking to Cassius corresponds closely with the internal…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite Brutus’s questionable attitude toward Caesar’s ascension to power, Cassius attempts to convince Brutus by gaining trust, proving Caesar’s lack of godlike qualities, and establishing guilt to express his ignorance to improve the situation in Rome. During a procession of Caesar, Cassius begins his conversion of Brutus by acquiring trust and credibility. Cassius eases into the conversation by calling him “good Brutus” (1,2,51+66). He uses flattery to set the stage for his eventual manipulation. Tempting Brutus’s sense of honor, Cassius tells him the people “wish’d that noble Brutus had his eyes” (1,2,62) to recognize that Caesar was going to yield an atrocious government.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The first thing I realized when Brutus was giving his speech was that he was intent on making everyone believe that if Caesar was still alive they would all remain and die slaves as said from the play, "Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves,". I think his speech was to make the people believe that killing Caesar was the right thing to do and by saying how much he loved Caesar would make the people think that it was the right thing to do. When Mark Antony gave his speech you could tell he was very upset when the plebeians started commenting on how red his eyes were, he convinced the people that what Brutus did was wrong while at the same time seeming like he was okay with it. Brutus's speech made all of the plebeians think Caesar wasn't a great ruler by saying he was too ambitious, " But, as he was ambitious, I slew him".…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Instead of having more of an emotional appeal to the people, Brutus's speech aimed for a logical reasoning of why Caesar had to die. As well as what kind of man he was. Thus Brutus’s speech consisted mainly of logos and partly ethos. By itself Brutus’s speech was overally good, however with the lack of pathos it didn’t really capture the hearts compared to Antony’s speech. This is what Shakespeare had intended to be his greatest downfall, especially due to how Brutus had Antony go last with his emotional statements of remembrance.…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He reminded the people that Caesar would have ruined Rome, become a tyrant and would have enslaved everyone, he said "had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead?". He says this as a rhetorical question: it has quite an obvious answer but probably would have been false anyway. Brutus says that last quote like it is fact and that it will happen. The fact makes it seem more real.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, the plot revolves around the protagonist, Marcus Brutus, and his actions. Brutus was not only a protagonist; he was also a tragic hero. A tragic hero is a literary character who makes a judgment error that inevitably leads to his/her own destruction. Brutus was characterized as a noble, honorable Roman throughout the entire play. But what did it really mean when his friends, allies, and even enemies described him as this virtuous character when an error in judgment would ultimately lead to his death?…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus Betrayer Analysis

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages

    There is a debate on whether Brutus was a patriot or a betrayer. Although, this is an opinionated question, your answer comes from an opinion also. I found my opinion within his actions. His actions speak louder than words, therefore I was able to hear him loud and clear. I followed and gathered why he did what he did, and in return, determined whether I agreed or not.…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whether public speeches result from those such as Adolf Hitler or Martin Luther King, Jr., their remarkable ability to ignite the population persuades people to take up arms regardless of the cause. In the midst of Act III in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony both speak to the bewildered citizenry regarding Caesar’s demise. Resulting from a handful of conspirators assassinating him in the Senate, Caesar’s death sparks chaos which demands explanation. Thus, some individuals assert Brutus’ speech over Antony’s by claiming that Brutus’ effect and ability to direct his point sooner propel him higher than Antony. Unfortunately, this argument fails to acknowledge Antony’s mightier impact on the audience and his employment of a larger…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus Speech Analysis

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After Caesar’s death, in the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the conspirators and Mark Antony speak to the public to explain what has happened to Caesar. Brutus, one of the main conspirators and Caesar’s best friend, talks first and gives the Romans the reason as to why Caesar had to be killed. Brutus’ speech is very convincing and he manipulates the crowd into believing him easily. After Brutus speaks, Mark Antony, Caesar’s good friend and second in command, gives a speech about Caesar and how he did not deserve to die, easily turning the crowd against Brutus and the other conspirators. Both speeches use persuasive techniques, like ethos, and rhetorical devices, like repetition and rhetorical questions, to manipulate their audiences…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays