Brutus’ struggle was deciding whether to protect Rome or his beloved Caesar. His love for the former eventually overpowers his love for the latter. He accepts that both Rome and Caesar cannot stand together, unharmed, as they work against each other’s best interest. One of them must be sacrificed for the greater good: “[T]his is my answer: not that I / loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.”(3.2.21-22) Needless to say, Brutus’ intentions were pure, or at least they appear to be. He doesn’t covet the throne, doesn’t show envy. He simply wants what is good for the people and feels that Caesar’s death was the only way to achieve that. William Fowler explains: “[A] good man could do incalculable harm from the best possible motives.” That’s the power of Shakespeare. He introduces themes that resonate with every reader, regardless of time period; every reader has surely fallen at the hands of poor judgement, a time when the intentions seem to justify the means. Are good intentions enough to excuse scheming and murder? What are the boundaries of a good man? His story arcs and contradictory schemes compels readers to think and question their own
Brutus’ struggle was deciding whether to protect Rome or his beloved Caesar. His love for the former eventually overpowers his love for the latter. He accepts that both Rome and Caesar cannot stand together, unharmed, as they work against each other’s best interest. One of them must be sacrificed for the greater good: “[T]his is my answer: not that I / loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.”(3.2.21-22) Needless to say, Brutus’ intentions were pure, or at least they appear to be. He doesn’t covet the throne, doesn’t show envy. He simply wants what is good for the people and feels that Caesar’s death was the only way to achieve that. William Fowler explains: “[A] good man could do incalculable harm from the best possible motives.” That’s the power of Shakespeare. He introduces themes that resonate with every reader, regardless of time period; every reader has surely fallen at the hands of poor judgement, a time when the intentions seem to justify the means. Are good intentions enough to excuse scheming and murder? What are the boundaries of a good man? His story arcs and contradictory schemes compels readers to think and question their own