In this essay I will compare two portrait paintings of Nicolaes Tulp who was a Dutch Surgeon and Dr. Samuel D. Gross who was an Academic Surgeon and a professor at a medical school. The first painting is “The Anatomy Lesson,” which was painted in 1632 by Rembrandt. The second painting is “The Gross Clinic which was painted in 1875 by Thomas C. Eakins. Both paintings are oil on canvas that depicts the doctor’s experiences with teaching the anatomy of the human body to other surgeons in training. In “The Anatomy Lesson” it shows Doctor Nicolaes Tulp dissecting the forearm of the corpse in order to demonstrate the workings of the muscle structure (“The Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Nicholas Tulp1”). Where as in “The Gross Clinic” Dr. Samuel D. Gross
…show more content…
They all seem very intrigued by the teachings of the professor but some of them seem in awe whereas others seemed shocked. In “The Gross Clinic” the background faces are very hard to see, the woman is covering her face, and the men helping the doctor are focused on the incision and you can mainly only see their profile. Doctor Samuel D. Gross is the only face that you can see, his face is painted very pale and washed out but you can tell he has a stern look on his face. His stern face can be depicted as very focused or even angry. Another similarity that wasn’t very noticeable at the beginning is in both pictures one of the men are holding a sheet of paper with writing on it. In “The Anatomy Lesson” the guy holding the sheet is starring out towards the viewer in a gaze and in “The Gross Clinic” the man is looking down at the paper almost as if he is double checking the steps of the new surgery invention or looking at the patients information. One source that wrote about “The Anatomy Lesson” suggest that this sheet with a list of names enhances the dramatic concentration on Tulp’s demonstration (“The Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp”1). Which would make sense because this painting was during the Baroque Movement, which was where they exaggerated …show more content…
Nicolaes Tulp”1). This coincides with the corpse of a man who did bad or sinned which has irony in itself. In the painting, “The Gross Clinic” is said to be trying to embody confidence from the doctor (“Portrait of Dr. Samuel D Gross1”). During this time period, a lot of the viewers were shaken because they weren’t used to seeing a fearsome event in such realistic detail (“Portrait of Dr. Samuel D Gross1”). When looking at “The Anatomy Lesson” you can tell that the author is trying to show the teaching of anatomy from the doctor by making the tendons stand out with the coloring. In contrast, people can argue that in “The Gross Clinic” the author could come off controversial due to the gruesome of the painting. It does not look like Dr. Samuel Gross is even teaching them what to do and with the blood spread everywhere it almost comes off as disturbing. Nowadays we don’t have people watching surgeries being performed so we aren’t used to seeing the blood and bones of the
They all seem very intrigued by the teachings of the professor but some of them seem in awe whereas others seemed shocked. In “The Gross Clinic” the background faces are very hard to see, the woman is covering her face, and the men helping the doctor are focused on the incision and you can mainly only see their profile. Doctor Samuel D. Gross is the only face that you can see, his face is painted very pale and washed out but you can tell he has a stern look on his face. His stern face can be depicted as very focused or even angry. Another similarity that wasn’t very noticeable at the beginning is in both pictures one of the men are holding a sheet of paper with writing on it. In “The Anatomy Lesson” the guy holding the sheet is starring out towards the viewer in a gaze and in “The Gross Clinic” the man is looking down at the paper almost as if he is double checking the steps of the new surgery invention or looking at the patients information. One source that wrote about “The Anatomy Lesson” suggest that this sheet with a list of names enhances the dramatic concentration on Tulp’s demonstration (“The Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp”1). Which would make sense because this painting was during the Baroque Movement, which was where they exaggerated …show more content…
Nicolaes Tulp”1). This coincides with the corpse of a man who did bad or sinned which has irony in itself. In the painting, “The Gross Clinic” is said to be trying to embody confidence from the doctor (“Portrait of Dr. Samuel D Gross1”). During this time period, a lot of the viewers were shaken because they weren’t used to seeing a fearsome event in such realistic detail (“Portrait of Dr. Samuel D Gross1”). When looking at “The Anatomy Lesson” you can tell that the author is trying to show the teaching of anatomy from the doctor by making the tendons stand out with the coloring. In contrast, people can argue that in “The Gross Clinic” the author could come off controversial due to the gruesome of the painting. It does not look like Dr. Samuel Gross is even teaching them what to do and with the blood spread everywhere it almost comes off as disturbing. Nowadays we don’t have people watching surgeries being performed so we aren’t used to seeing the blood and bones of the