I have read countless works online and in tabloids about how we should be protecting animals and fighting against animal cruelty, and have yet to be thoroughly convinced by these presentations of hypotheticals, analogies, images etc. Despite all of this, David Foster Wallace does the same exact thing in “Consider The Lobster” and leaves the reader in a state of pure anger at the Festival and sympathy for the lobster that has been seemingly unattainable by any other argument we’ve heard. Why exactly is he so much better at doing what others have been doing for years and what exactly makes his argument so
I have read countless works online and in tabloids about how we should be protecting animals and fighting against animal cruelty, and have yet to be thoroughly convinced by these presentations of hypotheticals, analogies, images etc. Despite all of this, David Foster Wallace does the same exact thing in “Consider The Lobster” and leaves the reader in a state of pure anger at the Festival and sympathy for the lobster that has been seemingly unattainable by any other argument we’ve heard. Why exactly is he so much better at doing what others have been doing for years and what exactly makes his argument so