Council At Nicaea Essay

By late 324, the churches of the East were sharply divided between Arius and Alexander. Presbyter Arius came into a direct disagreement with Bishop Alexander. It appears that Arius reproached Alexander for what he felt were misguided or heretical teachings being taught by the bishop. The disputes over Arianism were enormously significant both for the churches and for the Roman Empire itself.
Emperor Constantine wanted to unite the church for the purpose of the Empire, according to several Biblical scholars. He wanted the two groups to come to an agreement on the deity of Christ. The Jehovah’s Witnesses contend that the doctrine of the deity of Christ was forced upon the church by the Emperor Constantine at the council of Nicaea amid …show more content…
The word, homousios, found its way into the heart of the statement. The word, though, did not come from the language of the Holy Bible. This important word shaped the later discussions of Doctrine of God and Christology. In effect, “[Council] interpreted the Logos Christology in such a way as to exclude both Monarchianism and Arianism”.
Today, Jehovah’s Witnesses contend that the doctrine of the deity of Christ was forced upon the church by the Emperor Constantine at the council of Nicaea amid the protests of many of the bishops in attendance. Additionally, the founder of the Jehovah’s Witnesses, Charles Taze Russell, taught that the council of Nicaea, which condemned Arius , marked the beginning of the great apostasy about which the Apostle Paul warned in 2 Thessalonians 2. The Nicene Creed had anathematized Arius and his