Duty In Persian Literature Essay

Improved Essays
In every culture and in every person there is a different duty for them to do. Based on how important the duty is to them. Every culture has made an influence on people's morals and values. In ancient Persian culture they follow their own morals and values unlike in ancient Indian culture, they follow and respect the duties of social groups. In American culture they each follow their own rules and duties according to their own morals and values. It is one's responsibility to follow their own morals and values even if it could affect them negatively in the long run.
In Persian literature, there is a story about Rustam and Sohrab. What mainly goes on in this epic, is that Rustam and Sohrab fight to the death but Rustam doesn’t realize that
…show more content…
In World Civilizations, we learned about Socrates and Crito, which was a story by Plato. In this story, Socrates was unjustly imprisoned so Crito had come by to visit him and try to persuade him to escape. Socrates had strong morals and values, and one of his duties as a citizen of Athens was so stick by the law. In a way to explain to Crito, Socrates uses the example of people in everyday life. “And what of doing evil in return for evil, which is the morality of the many-is that just or not just?” (Crito 460). In this quote, what Socrates is trying to say is that if you do evil, evil come back. Socrates believed that it was better to let it be and stay in prison than to escape, because the consequences might come back worse and he wanted to be a role model and show what a good person looks like. “But why my dear Crito, should we care about the opinion of the many?” (Crito 104). Socrates didn’t care about what others thought or said, he believed what he was doing was right and no one was going to change that. His morals and values were strong, which helped him sustain his duty as a citizen, and even if this would hurt him in the end he would die a hero for sticking beside the law and completing his

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Socrates, the classical Greek philosopher and one of the founders of western philosophy, was accused by the people of being an atheist and corrupting the youth with his ideas. He was, then put into trial in which the jury decided that he was guilty, and finally he was sentenced to death. While being in the prison, waiting for the execution process, Crito, one of Socrates’ friends, came to visit him offering a plan by which Socrates can escape from prison before the day of his execution. However, Socrates refused to escape the death sentence. A large argument took place between Socrates and Crito concerning whether Socrates shall escape or not.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates and Thrasymachus’ Conception on Justice In Friedrich Nietzsche’s work, The Genealogy of Morality, he states that the existence of laws establishes what is just and unjust within a given society (Nietzsche 1280; sec 12). Thus, there does not seem to be anything explicitly virtuous for justice. In reference to the Republic, I will argue Socrates and Thrasymachus have different views on justice and will ultimately disagree with each other on Nietzsche 's conception of justice. Nietzsche’s entire work is trying to dissect morality from its origins.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s dialogue Gorgias, Socrates argues against Polus an ancient Greek orator, that tyrants and orators do not, in fact do what they want, instead they do what they see fit. As a result of this claim, Socrates believes tyrants and orators have the least power in their cities. This paper will primarily argue Socrates’s views through the definition of power, who holds the “real” power, that some things are inherently bad, and that there are different views of morality. The argument that Socrates sets forth states “If a person does whatever he sees most fit to do when he lacks intelligence, is this still ‘having power?’”…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People believed in the same concepts, the same gods, and the same values. Although he was going against the grain, Socrates remained honest with himself (and others) and followed his own moral principles—until the very end. Socrates states in his apology, “I couldn’t care less about death—if that isn’t putting it too bluntly—but all that I care about is not doing anything unjust or impious.” (Pg. 48,…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    All The Shah's Men Essay

    • 2144 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Following World War II, many different countries were left in ruins and began to rebuild, especially in Europe. Iran specifically, was recovering from being invaded by Soviet and British troops after being a neutral country in the war. In the book titled All the Shah’s Men, we get a more focused glimpse on Iran and all the foreign powers influencing the nation. Iran was ruled as a monarchy until 1979, and each king or emperor is given the title of “shah”. Every Shah ruled until death or they were overthrown.…

    • 2144 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What are the charges against Socrates as recorded in the Apology. Is he guilty of them? why or why not? In Plato’s Apology, there were several charges against Socrates during his trial.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Crito details an exchange between Socrates and his student Crito, in which they debate the relevance of the aforementioned principle as it pertains to Socrates ' fate. Crito tries to persuade Socrates to escape prison and therefore avoid death; he is in a state of disbelief when Socrates reveals that he has no desire to evade the death sentence. Socrates accepted his fate with an air of resignation, understanding that disobeying the verdict delivered by the court would be unjust. Crito adopts a different approach and argues that Socrates ' death in itself is unjust, due to the loss of wisdom and instruction that would result from his absence. Furthermore, Crito argues that although the act of escaping prison is unjust, the suffering that Socrates endured during the trial justified the deed.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Do you think Socrates did the right thing by allowing himself to be unjustly executed? Socrates had made an intelligent decision by sacrificing himself to protect the “Social contract” between the state and him, rather than escape from prison to break the rules. Use life to exchange for the preservation of his thought Escape from the prison is equivalent to destruct all of his thought and value what he had constructed during his lifetime. Because leaving Athens is kind of actions to contradict what he taught to his followers, be faithful to the righteousness.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Crito, Plato illustrates Socrates in a complete contrast to the image that the reader captured in The Apology. In the dialogue between Crito and Socrates, Crito tries to convince Socrates that escaping out of jail is the right the thing to do. Crito first argues by explaining that it would be wrong for Socrates to throw his life away in prison because if he decides to remain in prison then he will be doing exactly what his enemies intended to do. Crito continues his argument by explaining that if he were to remain in jail he will be silenced, thus, Socrates would be conspiring with other people who are trying to do something unethical. Crito continues by brining forth Socrates’ children and how they would be affected and would be left without a father, however, Socrates isn’t convinced by Crito’s…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most of his works acknowledge Socrates as a clear minded citizen, concerned with affairs of the city, judicious, and always willing to help others…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Crito, a dialogue written by Plato, the Greek philosopher Socrates is sentenced to death because of corrupting the youth, creating new gods, and being an atheist. Centuries later, another prominent figure, Martin Luther King, Jr., is jailed for civil disobedience in Birmingham, Alabama in 1963. When questioned of their imprisonment, Plato and King, Jr. are both determined to maintain justice despite the injustices charged against them, but for Plato, justice means upholding the law at all costs since one should do no wrong, whereas King is concerned with reforming the law, therefore doing wrong could make a “right”. To both King and Socrates, a portion of injustice in law damages justice as a whole.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the government's eyes, Socrates was starting some kind of movement by changing the way people perceived their lives and the way they perceived the gods. They unjustly accused him of crimes that did not fit the punishment given to him. Socrates’ was a good and wise man, but his teachings contradicted the Athens…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates was right to stay in Athens no matter the consequences because he thought doing the right thing was always the better way. He believed that it was it was wrong to bridge an agreement. In this case, he felt he had disobeyed the Nation and was ready to face the consequences. He was right because he knew that the law had no favor of his actions. Socrates made up his mind that it was wrong for him to break out of prison.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates was opinionated and brash, two aspects that hurt him in his trial. He did not cower when it was…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Shreyaan swadharmo vigunah para-dharmaat swanushthitaat swadharme nidhanam shreyah para-dharmo bhayaavahah // 3.35 // 35. Performing one’s own duty however unpleasant or small, or devoid of merit (that is determined by one’s inherent nature) is preferable to a well performed duty of another (that is in accordance with that person’s nature) as it is not conducive to one’s spiritual growth because the performance of another’s duty even if that is performed well is associated with fear of downfall (as it may not be in accordance with his dominant nature and the performance may not be up to the mark and it is also stepping into another’s shoes that is unnecessary). Even if one has to face death while engaging in one’s duty, it is preferable because…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays