For example, from a completely theoretical perspective, lets us say that for sake of discussion that you selected a card that instructs you to punch a classmate in the head, and then to steal their wallet and money. While there is no possible way that we would ever be asked to do this, but let’s say you did. You, and the rest of the people in class would of course refused to perform such a task as it would be an affront to our individual moralities and shared ethical code. It would also be a very serious criminal act under state law, and depending on who the target was it could also be a very serious violation of federal law, and of course a serious breach of the rules and code of behavior. But, it is OK to …show more content…
Then under federal law you would explain that a specific law regards the assignment would be a violation of the students civil rights, and you would explain why this is. Then you need to cite the student conduct prohibition on that action, and in each case you need to cite chapter and verse that tell you not to do the assigned thing, because it means that you are ethically thinking through the matter, and that you have a justified and rational position, based in specific