Explain Why It Is Wrong To Mistreat Animals

Improved Essays
It is wrong to mistreat animals because mistreating animals is like mistreating another human being. Animals feel pain the same way humans feel pain. They are living beings and bleed like humans bleed. This alone isn’t what distinguishes animals from having or not having rights. Animals do have rights to a certain extent. Animals have the right not be mistreated and used by humans.
Indirect duty means that we don’t have direct duties to animals, but we do have duties about animals. So torturing an animal is wrong because it harms the animal not because it upsets other humans. Direct duty means that we have a direct duty to not be harmful, but kind to animals. Doing kind acts aren’t guaranteed to be morally right because you can still be kind but cruel at the same time in a way. For
…show more content…
It is mainly the farm animals, lab rats and other animals in this category that are being treated cruelly. Some of the other animals’ people are a little more sentimental towards which isn’t fair to the ones being tested on. This is why you see lab experiments being test on these certain animals rather than all. They all should have the same respect from humans because they’ve done nothing wrong to us. Contractarianism isn’t a great way to determine if animals have rights or not. We have some direct duties to animals because they are to be treated fairly and also acting as a n indirect duty is not entirely true for animals.
An objection would be Animals have inherent value, just not as much as human. But even saying this means that you would have to agree that animals have rights to a certain extent. Animals don’t have the intelligence and thought process as human beings which easily distinguish them. In conclusion animals should have rights to a certain extent to where they aren’t being lab experiments resulting in torture and them feeling

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Ought animals have rights, or ought they fall under the category of being morally considerable? I argue that there is no single framework in which to address the moral treatment of animals. A careful blend of these two ideas, moral rights and…

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although humans have evolved to the point where we can devote some attention to honoring the animals that help us build our society, we should not degenerate our society to account for their feelings. One such story of degeneration is of Kevin Martin, a man whose research of AIDS medication was halted by the Swiss Health Department on account of an ethic review that had already been approved by other organizations.(Yong 39) Another example are animals farmed for meat consumption. Although ultimately, they are born just to die, they aren't killed for the sake of killing; They are killed to aid human society. As callous as it sounds, animals having more rights would work to stagnate human progress due to extra regulations both legally and…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the wise man Edward Freeman once said, “These awful wrongs and sufferings forced upon the innocent, helpless, faithful animal race, form the blackest chapter in the whole world’s history.” In the article “A Change of Heart about Animals” Jeremy Rifkin discusses that animals are no different than humans. Being no different than humans means that someone or something is similar to a human being because of either their characteristics or similar body parts. Animals are like humans in the way that they are intelligent, affectionate, and skillful. Animals learn by their behavior as well as humans, however, the only difference is many animals are brutally abused.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There has been an ongoing debate on whether it is logical to have animal rights or not. You can either say that animal rights is foolish because animals are not developed enough to understand human behavior and they do not experience the same struggles as humans, therefore, they should not be given the same rights. On the other hand, one who supports animal rights, might say that animals should be given rights because even though they may not have the same human experiences, they do experience physical pain, emotion, and stress. They are still living beings, which makes it our responsibility to preserve the welfare of animals. Well what do you think?…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is no doubting the fact that animals do not have rights in the conventional sense, or in any other sense for that matter. The reason is because they are not moral agents; they cannot do things out of a sense of right or wrong and cannot reason, as opposed to humans. Without reasoning, they are unable to have rights and therefore, are not responsible. Does that mean humans have the right to treat animals badly? Of course not; but that is for humans to decide, because animals cannot decide anything.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Rights Animals being worn, slaughtered and tested on around the globe. Have you ever had a pet? Would you want this to happen to your pet? More than 100 million innocent animals of all varieties, including rats, mice, rabbits and guinea pigs, are killed in the experimentation laboratories of the United States. Unfortunately for these cute critters, animal testing is not the only way they have been subjected to injustice and cruelty.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine life without depending on any animals. For some it may be easy for instance a vegetarian but hard for the meat lovers. Animals do much more than just feeding us. They can find cures for diseases like cancer and AIDS. In the essay “The Evil of Animal Rights,” there is a group of people who disagree with animal testing.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alex Epstein and Yaron Brook, the co-authors of the essay “The Evil of Animal “Rights”’ elucidate that, animal rights activists are terrorists who use violence to get their requests accepted by different entities. Epstein and Brook, who are for animal testing belief that, using animals for testing is very vital when conducting research for possible cures of terminal diseases like cancer and AIDS. However, they do not seem to get their way…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The animals are innocent; if they’re not going to harm us, then why should we harm them? Perhaps God has created them to provide us with tasteful diet, but they also have feelings and they also have a family of their own that they want to take care of just like us humans. The animals are certainly more worth than they are being treated. It’s our responsibility to treat animals better because animals are incapable of defending themselves. Therefore, people should consider reducing the amount of meat they usually consume.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The innocent, behind closed doors Is the punishment for animal abuse enough?Animal abuse comes in a lot of different ways. It can be something as simple as not giving an animal that is under your care food or water and it is often called neglect. It is against the law even if it`s your own pet. There is still a lot of animal abuse around the world with so many different types of it. Would enforcing stronger laws help with animal abuse?…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animals should have freedom as much as humans, especially when it comes to something they haven 't done. “They shake and cower in fear” harming their self and for most are more than likely killed. “Almost all of us grew up eating meat, wearing leather, going to a circus and to zoos, we never considered the impact of these actions in the animals involved. Furthermore you are asking yourself now, why should animals have rights?” They languish in pain and suffer from extreme frustration, ache with loneliness and they only long to be free.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animals should not have the same rights that humans have. Animals do not have the mind and…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Opening Statement All around the world on a daily basis animals are being harmed because of humans. We are forcing these animals to suffer for our entertainment, experimental, and food purposes. Many animals are subjected to harsh treatment. The experimental division in animals uses them to their advantage. While innocent animals are used on tv and in bull fights for entertainment.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thesis Statement Animals deserve rights, and these rights should annihilate the problems with animal abuse, abandonment, and animal experimentation. Purpose Statement The purpose of this research paper is to discuss animal rights and what animals right activist ideology fight for which includes animal abuse, abandonment, experimentation, and laws that prevent inhuman actions towards animals.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Animal Rights Should animals have rights? If so, should these rights be comparable to those given to humans? Animal Rights are rights believed to be owed to animals in order for them to live full lives, free from suffering. Animals are currently being used, and in some cases abused, in medical research, clothing industries, hunting for sport, food, and population control, and countless other services to humans. As is the case with all ethical issues, there are two defined perspectives and supporters of the current and future treatment given and due to animals.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays