Factory Farmed Animals Research Paper

Improved Essays
The question of morality is consistently paired with the consumption of animals and animal byproducts. Those who favor consumption defend their belief with testimony of ignorance, claims of non-involvement, and tradition. Opponents of this consumption defend their belief by citing instances where human consumption of animals and their byproducts have adversely affected the environment and permitted the mistreatment of factory farmed animals.
If it is wrong to torture animals for gustatory pleasure, then it is immoral to eat animals. It is wrong to torture animals for gustatory please. Therefore, it can be held that it is immoral to eat animals. One of the largest issues large factory farms face is the amount of waste (excrement) that accrues before the animals are slaughtered and transported all over the world—namely swine. This overwhelming amount of feces must go somewhere and is commonly put into ponds strictly for the excrement— “waste lagoons”. To the average person this plan seems efficient enough and environmentally sustainable. However, suppose that a factory farm that uses a waste lagoon system is near the eastern coast of the United States; if a hurricane were to land near the lagoon, the tremendous amounts of rain that proceeds and antecedes a hurricane would easily cause a lagoon to overflow and deposit excrement riddled with harmful bacteria. As the liquid from the waste lagoons traveled it is highly likely to contaminate other water ways and further pollute and damage nearby ecosystems. A popular practice to disperse and dispose of the liquid in waste lagoons is to fertilize fields (Peach). This too sounds like a
…show more content…
It is wrong to torture animals for gustatory pleasure and now one can see why it is immoral to eat animals as well as animal

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    There is big issue concerning the processing of meat. Many Americans consume meats that comes from animals that have been treated cruelly. The author argues that the people who consume this meat are morally wrong. This argument works by establishing a real life situation, that appeals to the heart. Many Americans love puppies and comparing puppies to the animals eaten for meat , the author successfully uses the analogy to better appeal to the reader.…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Payton White Professor Hunsaker 3 September 2016 Articles 26 & 27 After analyzing article 26, “Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases” by Alastair Norcross, a couple things become apparent. Such as (only use “such as” if you are continuing the sentence, but not to start a new sentence.) our author opening up his piece with a fictional scenario that seems a tad bit crazy, but serves as a very serious philosophical point. According to our ( it would be best to just say, “the” author instead of “our” author.) author, Norcross sees meat-eaters-at least those who know of the treatment of factory-farmed animals-are completely at fault for the consumption of meat.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Factory Farms: The Veal Industry Everyone has the right to choose what he/she eats and what they do not, especially when it comes to meat. Some may think that cows provide one purpose, and that is to be consumed by humans, while others may disagree with the thoughts regarding conscious animals and their rights. Meat is a great source of protein; one popular meat in America is veal. Veal is the flesh of a calf that is used for food.…

    • 2995 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If their lives have less value than that of humans, and their deaths would benefit humans, then killing and eating them is justified.1 The joy humans feel when eating meat outweighs the negatives of extinguishing of animal life, whether humane or not. My view on this issue closely aligns with those of Alastair Norcross, the author of “Puppies, Pigs and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases.” Eating meat that is the result of factory farming is morally wrong, and a moral person shouldn’t be taking pleasure from the products of torture.3 Almost no one can feign ignorance of the issues; videos of abuses have surfaced online, or been broadcasted through documentaries and by PETA, so anyone with access to social media or the Internet is aware that these methods of slaughter are not ethical. In the United States, the overabundance of food options and grocery stores indicates that we no longer need to hunt and gather to survive. Meat has become a luxury item since the vitamins and proteins it may provide us with can be gleaned from other sources.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is a CAFO? Well that’s a simple question really; it’s short for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations. It is the act of keeping animals in a confined area so that there is no risk of escaping and how “farmers” can maximize their land without having to pay more money. With the treatment of these animals so poorly, farmers are able to saved money and sell big with the small amounts of care given to the livestock . The animals are only able to get food from the handlers and can’t go out of their pens by themselves, this means they see no sunlight.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is the purpose of eating? Is it to enjoy the umami of the food? Is it to become morally correct? Or is it just to satisfy the basic body needs to survive? Singer’s “Animal Liberation” seeks to end the discrimination of nonhuman animals, especially the consumption of them, based on the vegan ideal that advocates a diet with no animal suffering and cruelty.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    You, have probably found yourself at some point in your life eating a juicy bucket of fried chicken. Of course we are all aware that, that chicken was once a living creature; many people try to defend the slaughter industry by saying, it’s the circle of life, or they don’t suffer they just kill them, but we seem to have an unrealistic view of slaughter because it is actually quite, cruel, unneeded, and bad for the environment. Vegans have heard many things from I don’t care; I do care but meat is just so good; don’t we need protein?; too animals are soulless and were put by god for humans to kill, but there has been much research to prove animals do feel emotion and pain, though this is true it take no scientist to see the fear in the eyes…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Michael Pollan’s “An Animal’s Place” Pollan provides an argument on whether or not Americans should consume animals, and specifically, if the fashion in which animals are farmed and slaughtered respects their capacity to suffer. Pollan illustrates his personal dilemma particularly when he ironically points his debate on whether or not to eat meat began while he was dining at a steakhouse. To develop his argument, Pollan initially exclusively uses the citation of animal rights activists, but then gradually cites experts that support his conclusion that Americans eat animals as long as the principle behind it is correct, and animals are treated with respect. He asserts to accomplish respecting animals that Americans need to regain their contact…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Learning the Basic In the book Animal Farm by George Orwell there are many lessons taught by the characters in the book. These lessons are somewhat hidden but very basic and are seen in everyday life today. The lessons all should be treated equally and too much power for one person show up throughout the story as things go from good to bad within the society of animals. These lessons are important to the society of animals and to society today. Too much power for one person is a big lesson in Animal Farm.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal farm is a book written by George Orwell about animals taking over their farm and getting control over the other animals. There are many themes in this book such as control, terror, lies, equality and many more. The pigs represent a corrupt government that lies to their people but disguise their badness. Orwell's argument would be not to trust the government. Two of animal farm's main themes would be control and terror.…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Is Veganism?

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Major fast food companies spend hundreds of thousands of dollars investing in farm factories, animal-based products, and attempting to transition to “all-natural” beef. However, these companies could be saving millions of dollars if they were to abandon the majority of their funding for these products. The low availability of vegan food in fast food chains can and will lead to more serious health issues in consumers and impact the profits of major fast food chains. For example, it would cost much less for a chain to make a bean based burger that tastes almost identical. On the other hand, since meat and dairy are the main ingredients in most of fat food items, it leads to further problems rather than just money.…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When pigs take over Manor Farm, life as the animals hoped it to be is lost in the pigs strives for power. Mr. Jones treats his animals poorly, causing them to revolt in the name of Animalism. Afterwards the animals set their minds to building a windmill for the good of the farm, which turns into a miserable place of lies and betrayal. George Orwell’s Animal Farm includes allegorical elements and themes and symbols to show real world significance and importance. Orwell’s life story and novel will cultivate many strong opinions in the minds of his readers.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Torture

    • 1088 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Over the years, the human population has struggled over many moral dilemma such as human values and life decisions. The debate of torture is one of the many moral dilemmas. Some say torture is a human right violation, but others say it is necessary for the humanity. Torture has been used since the medieval age to extract information or for punishment to a person. In that time era torture was not a decision of right and wrong but a necessity of doing what is needed to survive in a harsh world.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ethical Argument In Animal Welfare

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited

    Many show that a major issue in animal welfare should be solved by vegetarianism and not torture animals to get their meat. As Freeman argues, “animals used for food in the United States are commonly treated like unfeeling tools of production, rather than living, feeling animals,” (Freeman 170). Many feel the need to reduce meat because of animal cruelty, and not because of the welfare of the…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Project 8 How many of you think it's wrong to hurt animals? So you already believe in being a vegetarian. Good evening to one and all present here.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays