In most cyber bullying court cases, the cyber bully will usually argue that they are exercising their rights to freedom of speech. They can intentionally post images, videos, or texts online and state that they are merely exercising their fundamental freedom and thus are not infringing on another person's (the victim's) fundamental rights as detailed in the first amendment. The problem, therefore, is the conflict between these two laws. For example, according to the first amendment to the constitution of the United States, the congress has no right to make a law that abides the freedom of speech. Citizen should be free to convey their ideas without fearing the legal consequences of their actions. However, a victim can sue for libel if they can prove it. Time and time again through cases of …show more content…
In this doctrinal research, I will be concerned with the discovery of legal doctrines and cases. I will analyze the cyber bullying laws, and what it decrees on the cyber bulling as a whole. It is important to note that in doctrinal legal research, the validity of the research findings is never affected by the empirical world. In this case, this research design is a normative research was it mainly focuses on how the states and the citizens should behave. This research will be subjective and argument based and not the empirical data based research because the validity of this research will rest upon their ability to develop a consensus with