So, he well-defined a technical resolution as one that requires very minim or do not able to change at all. That is the only solution is “privatizing the activities since if left to the commoners”, they won’t have the opportunity to take control over anything (Hardin). However, Milton Friedman and Elinor Ostrom are some of the intellectuals who opposed the tragedy of the commons by Garrett Hardin by demonstrating that the common people can be in charge of the available resources, further than denationalization. In the other hand, Ostrom has documented how countless our community manage the common resources, Milton Friedman encouraged for unobstructed place where freedom is for everyone. These two researchers would try to find different resolution for the society, instead of trying to fight against the increasing of population they would embrace it and look forward for solutions that can work for the better of the future. (Hardin
So, he well-defined a technical resolution as one that requires very minim or do not able to change at all. That is the only solution is “privatizing the activities since if left to the commoners”, they won’t have the opportunity to take control over anything (Hardin). However, Milton Friedman and Elinor Ostrom are some of the intellectuals who opposed the tragedy of the commons by Garrett Hardin by demonstrating that the common people can be in charge of the available resources, further than denationalization. In the other hand, Ostrom has documented how countless our community manage the common resources, Milton Friedman encouraged for unobstructed place where freedom is for everyone. These two researchers would try to find different resolution for the society, instead of trying to fight against the increasing of population they would embrace it and look forward for solutions that can work for the better of the future. (Hardin