Henry Fonda In 12 Angry Men

Decent Essays
Henry Fonda
Henry Fonda is playing the role of Davis (8th juror) and is the leading actor in the movie. By profession he is an architect but appears as the first dissenter in the jury who was of the view that the accused is not guilty of the murder and there exists a reasonable doubt in the matter. Basically, he is being presented as a protagonist in the movie. Lee J. Cobb
Lee J. Cobb (3rd juror) is an antagonist in the movie. He is a businessman and a distraught father opinionated and stubborn on the view that the accused is guilty of the murder. He sticks to his view till the last until he has an emotional breakdown which makes him declare the accused to be not guilty.
Ed Begley
He is shown as the 10th juror in the movie who had
…show more content…
He is at first domineered by others but finds his voice as the discussion goes on and later on gives the vote of not being guilty for the accused.

Jack Klugman
He is shown as the 5th juror in the movie who himself belongs from a violent slum area. He is a soft-spoken young man who changes his vote to not guilty when it was proved that due to the disturbance created by the train, it was not possible to listen what the accused yelled.
Edward Binns
He is shown as the 6th juror in the movie who is a house painter by profession. He is tough but a principled and respectful person who raises a question in jury regarding the limiting ability of the witness to walk.
Joseph Sweeney
He is shown as the 9th juror who plays the role of McCardle in the movie. He is a wise and observant elderly man who is the only juror to vote ‘not guilty’ in the secret ballot.
George Voskovec
He is shown as the 11th juror in the movie. He is a thoughtful German watchmaker and a naturalized American citizen who changes his vote to ‘not guilty’ after considering the point that the accused would not come back to the crime scene after three hours instead he would have made sure that there are no fingerprints left on the knife and would have cleared the crime

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This is very important because it gives the possibility that someone else might have committed the murder rather than the boy. This also gets some of the other jurors that little extra push to get them to join the non-guilty side. Literary Conclusion: In conclusion, Juror Five’s change in personality from Act One to Act Three is a crucial part in the Jurors deliberations Value: Twelve Angry Men describes what many of us fail see in social situations, dynamic personalities. And the effect these can have on a discussion, or in this case, a life. Many Jurors seem to stay static throughout the play, such as Juror Eight or Seven.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In both of the trials, the citizens and other members of jury believe that the defendant is guilty based solely on the defendants’ race; however, Atticus and Davis both disagree with the popular opinion and are more than willing to prove and support their own opinion. In 12 Angry Men , Juror 3 loudly proclaims that the boy is guilty and that all ghetto youths are criminals, while Juror 7 wants the jury to reach a decision quickly because he wishes to attend a baseball game that evening. Juror 1 conducts a preliminary ballot and eleven jurors vote for conviction without hesitation. When Davis, or Juror 8, is the only one to disagree and cast the only dissenting vote, Juror 10 gruffly declares that Davis is a weak-willed "bleeding heart". While Juror 2, a shy and stammering bank clerk, appears to be maintaining his guilty verdict because he feels intimidated by the more outspoken jurors, Davis proudly stands his ground refusing to conform to the others’ opinions.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The New juror came in the second to last day and had opinions but mostly kept quiet. The Quiet one did not do much talking except for voting. Every juror plays a distinct part in deciding the fate of the defendant, which showed during 12 Angry Men and during a personal jury when deciding whether or not OJ Simpson was…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Reflection

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The viewers then find out that it was not juror number five who voted not guilty, it was juror number nine who voted guilty. He feels that juror eight’s point deserve to be discussed and gone over before they reach their “realist…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Questions On 12 Angry Men

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What formal authority does Juror #8, played by Henry Fonda, have? What are some of the ways he mobilizes the group to achieve its purpose? Juror #1 had formal authority. He started by assigning number and creating a system to maintain the order.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    My favorite character in the movie was Juror number 8. He was my favorite because he was the one who convinced the others to believe that the boy was not guilty about his father’s death. All the other jurors' believed that the boy was guilty in the beginning of the movie, except number 8. Even though the others tried to convince number 8 that the boy was guilty, juror number 8 did not change his vote at all. He was a static character throughout the movie, while the others were dynamic characters.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    My favorite character was juror number 8 because since the beginning he defended his opinion and throughout the film he never gave up until he made the other jurors agree with him and understand that what they were about to do was not right without giving out good explanations or evidence about blaming the boy of being guilty. Juror number 8 even made the other jurors change their mind and gave out strong enough reasons to demonstrate how the boy was not guilty over the old man's murder. I also like how he defended the boy and didn't let him get locked up for something he said he didn't do. This juror was also so calmed during the whole court and he never made a big deal about anything but just explain his reason and opinion.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Their choice would either send an 18-year-old Hispanic man to death or set him free. When the twelve men were locked in the deliberation room, the jury foreman acted as the facilitator for the group. It was the jury foreman that got everyone focused for the initial vote. It was important get everyone focused because the group was busy discussing their personal life, occupations, and their future plans. They were not discussing the case because they assumed everyone would vote the same.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror eight appealed to the jury’s values. He told a story about the innocent boy (innocent when he was young) being harmed as he was growing up. The boy was beaten by his dad when he was young. Juror eight did a tremendous job of appealing to the emotions of the others; as his approach changes the minds of the jurors. For example, Juror number nine says “this gentleman has been standing alone against us, he doesn’t say the boy isn’t guilty, he just isn’t sure” (12 angry men 1957).…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roles In Twelve Angry Men

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Most of the time he is a loud outspoken person with strong beliefs on his own opinions without looking at different perspectives. As a result he can be seen as the stage hog, because he wants to be heard by speaking loud and obnoxiously. He also does not let other jurors speak fully, because their opinions are not clearly important to him. As a result, it caused all the other jurors to turn their backs on him, while he was…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Several of the jurors get up to see it better.)” (Rose 39). The actions of the jury demonstrate that although they might not care as much as they should for the boy since Juror #8 cares, they are willing to listen. Juror #8 argues the evidence given throughout the trial to prove not guilty with reasonable doubt. This sets both plays a part in the sense that John does not have supporting evidence to prove his ideas while Juror #8…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guilty or not guilty is a life threatening question for an eighteen-year-old boy in the film 12 Angry Men who has been tried for a first-degree murder. The eighteen-year-old boy has been accused of stabbing his own father and the case has been left in the hands of a twelve-man jury in which a guilty verdict mean the automatic death of the boy. Throughout the film, we are able to recognize various communication skills that the twelve individuals display. Leadership There are two types of leaders shown in this film. Since the beginning of the film juror number eight demonstrated to be an emergent leader by not being a follower even though he was the only one who pleaded not guilty and was willing to stand alone against the rest of the jury who pleaded guilty.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Except for juror number eight, peer pressure impaired their judgment. Based on his maturity level it indicated that the greatest differences are found in juror number eight and three. Once juror (Jack) changed his vote from guilty to not guilty only because the rest of them eventually voted not guilty also. It showed many times that the several jurors changed their minds from not guilty to guilty and vice versa under peer pressure, and overpowering of the strong willed ones.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Groupthink In 12 Angry Men

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Also, the members of the jury questioned the testimony of the old man. They questioned how the old man ran to the door and down the hall in such a short amount of time, yet he drug his leg when he walked and had a stroke the previous year. The jury questioned why the boy could not remember what movie he was supposedly at. They thought his knife was very unusual until one of the jurors bought the same exact knife for cheap right beside the boys house. The jury questioned how the women across the street could see into the window without wearing her glasses and they questioned how she turned over in bed at just the right time that she saw the murder happen.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Observe Juror #8 (Henry Fonda) as the leader. In the movie, Juror #8 is able to persuade his fellow jurors to change their opinions. Based on what you have learned in class, describe the leadership style he uses to do this. Present your analysis providing evidence from the film to support your position.…

    • 1362 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays