Mark Skousen's No More Political Labels

Improved Essays
It is human nature to view the world wanting to categorize it and its contents into groups in order to efficiently predict the characteristics of that person or object. This tactic of categorizing is referred to as labelling or stereotyping. In politics, labels like “left-wing”, “right-wing”, “liberal”, “conservative” and many others are used to organize people or groups into convenient ideological boxes that are easy to understand. However, this method of labelling is often simplistic and causes more confusion, biases and debate than it solves. They often pit politicians against each other and impede on their individual endeavours. In theory, labels are simple and easy, however, politicians and the parties they belong to are far more intricate …show more content…
This is the reason labels are often an inaccurate description of a person’s or group’s views. Unlike this binary would suggest, finding politicians or political parties who's views align perfectly with either “left-wing” or “right-wing” is virtually impossible. Most politicians, political parties and their supporters have values associated with both “left” and “right” and yet they are generalized in order to fit them into a specific group. In his article No More Political Labels, Please, Mark Skousen says “Labels put people into political boxes and keep them there, preventing individuals from objectively considering alternative opinions and changing their minds” (Skousen, 1999), which illustrates how detrimental labels can be the improvement of society. Although labelling may seem like an easier way to sift through candidates and their supporters, it ignores those with nuanced and complex values, a trait which allows for real progress to be made and which is shared by …show more content…
However, their dangers appear when the polarizing environment they create takes away from meaningful and relevant discourse, which should be the most important role of a societies government and its politics. Although they aim is to promote efficiency, when dealing with the policies, laws and officials who will govern countries and the world, thoroughness and meticulousness rather than efficiency should be the top priority. Generalizing rids the world of its intricate, unique and constantly changing aspects which give it the ability to adapt to and accommodate specific circumstances. Political labelling impedes on this ability and leads the world to value trivial issues rather than those that truly

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the United States, our government is made up of people with different political ideologies and assertions. Our association with certain political parties is an example of our differences. Republicans and Democrats throughout history have represented the interests of their supporters rightfully. Conservatives have contrasting views upon the economy, social issues, and international policy. Liberals uphold democracy to its highest standards and support an equal political community.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Liberals are from Mars and conservative from Venus. The main theme of Predisposed: Liberals, Conservatives, and the Biology of Political Differences is to present the reader with how neither is better than the other, but different. The book focuses on the analysis on how biology determines our political views and inclinations. John R. Hibbings, Kevin B. Smith and Jon R. Alford are the authors of Predisposed. As biopoliticians, they provide evidence of people’s view and how it differs based on biology.…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his essay “When They’re Not Assholes,” Tim Kreider eloquently describes the disparities and commonalities among the politically Left and Right. Kreider exemplifies what it means to be on either side, illustrating how the tension between the groups is much less about policy and due much more to the primal and egotistical nature of humankind. Kreider goes to excellent lengths to set aside his unapologetically liberal values to concede that his ideologically like-minded peers are just alike conservatives: victims of the human condition.…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In conclusion, some Americans wrongly view specific groups of conservative citizens and sources of media as alt-right. Highly conservative views do not make a person alt-right, but radical conservative views do. As the divide between the far left and center and far right and center continue to expand, citizens in the United States need to know the difference between radical and rational ideas, no matter where they fall on the spectrum. If everyone accepts and tolerates each other, the ideological divide will cease to…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In democracy, public opinion is very important for politicians because citizens are the ones who elect their office representatives, at the same time citizens have to act together to solve collective action problems. Polls express citizens’ public opinion that government pays attention and mobilize their campaigns around these opinions. However, a person has a combination of different beliefs, feelings and behavior about politics based on information and knowledge that has been acquired throughout different sources. Also, how consistent and strong are these attitudes vary by person. In addition, at individual level opinion on certain issues, evaluations of candidates, campaigns, and parties are based on five different factors.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Partisanship Polarization

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Sunstein and Hastie suggest that individuals become more polarized when they associate only with those who share the same political beliefs. Thus, an individual’s beliefs will intensify and they will identify as either more Republican or more Democratic dependent upon their original political identity. Sunstein and Hastie contribute the growing partisan divide on the groupthink phenomena rather than changing ideological beliefs. Thus, as the political parties become more divided along partisan lines the groupthink phenomena will continue to widen the…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    While a political party may share similar interests, core belief groups lie within these parties that separate them even more. To understand this and why there is not one hundred percent of either party approving,…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Political parties are such a key aspect to the society than the average United States citizen may think. They play an active role in our society and have been since the early days of America in the 1800’s. Looking back into history, it reveals the true functions of the political parties that play a factor into how the people of early America were impacted by them. The American government system would be nowhere if it were not due to the building of the political party groups. Many people know the political parties as two or more groups trying to fight each other for election, which is true, but they also check on the other party, influence the public, as well as inform the public about the other and any wrong doings that they commit.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the United States of America when people talk about politics only two major parties come to mind, the republicans or the democrats. People usually think that if one does not like taxes, then they tend to associate with the Republicans, if they want more social programs they associate themselves with the Democrats. One fact that people always seem to forget is that the United States of America is not a two party state and that there are several other parties out there with which the people can associate themselves with depending upon their personal preferences on how a country should be run or what policies they would like to see implemented. There are several reasons why the two major parties dominate the political landscape. One of the…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most people think citizens should explicitly belong to one side or the other. However, that’s not how it works and that’s not how it will ever work. Some people are in the middle, some are closer to one side or the other but don’t totally agree with one or the other. In reality, we have thousands of parties closely related. This is it’s hard to accomplish anything.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Political party has long been dividing people: From the Whigs to the Tories; socialist to conservative; Left wings to the right. Government tends to have two polar sides. For George Washington’s farewell address, he wrote “Let me...warn you in the most solemn manner against the bane ful effects of the spirit of party... it serves always to distract the public councils and enfeeble the public administration.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Incivility is not a new topic in American politics, in fact, it has continued to get worse over the years. In “The Negative Consequences of Uncivil Political Discourse” Sandy Maisel states that the “lack of civility has led to the decline in citizen approval of trust in our institutions of government” (Maisel 405). Maisel discusses the impact of incivility and how it can sway the public opinion to doubt the way politics are being handled. He discussing about how uncivil outbursts are not what cause concern, it is the lack of action, since politicians use this as a strategy to obtain more supporters and votes (Maisel 405). Maisel believes those who pursue the common good do so in a civil manner because civility is necessary to have an effective…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The “Game of Elections” is known as in other words as the American electoral process or political system. There are five main players in this game and they are political parties, interest groups, media, candidates, and voters. Each of these players play a key role in the American election and how each one has a major effect on voter decision-making. (to be continued)……

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is polarization? Throughout the course of American history, arguments occur regarding what role and function the government should play in the democratic process. Since the formation of two major political parties during the 1800s, political polarization began to impact how the government functions. According to Political Polarization in American Politics, polarization is defined as diverging from median Republican and Democratic views and increases when the political stances and ideologies move further to the left or right of the middle, central view (Hopkins and Sides 2015, 17).…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Zinn's Two-Party System

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Howard Zinn, a noted historian and social activist describes the American system as the “the most ingenious system of control in world history.” This system has perfected itself in manner that prevents the middle and working classes of the United States from joining together and actually challenging the system. Throughout his book, A People’s History of the United States, Zinn describes a plethora of government actions and major events that have contributed to this system. I believe that he would point to the advent of the two-party system as the event or series of events that did the most to lead us to our current situation.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays