Rulers around the world have many different ideas and thoughts about what makes an effective ruler. Some may think that having supreme rule over of all aspects of a person’s life marks a great ruler. Others see true leadership as the ability to lead by example, showing that a ruler is human like everyone else. Nicolo Machiavelli was of the former thinking. In his book “The Prince,” Machiavelli gives guidance on what believes to be the best practices for ruling. However, Machiavelli’s suggestions for ruling is all from the standpoint of fear, and not out of character. Ruling out of fear may work for a time, but given enough time the citizens will eventually conspire against the governing entity and form a revolt.
Machiavelli wrote “The Prince” as a guide for ruling, governing, and maintaining political power. The twenty-six chapters address the types of states, armies and military conduct, and the character of the ruler. Viewing the issues and methods from purely a way to secure the future and riches of the ruler, Machiavelli makes sense. However, looking at what makes a great ruler from the standpoint of more than just political gain, and maintaining wealth, the views of Machiavelli contain multiple flaws. Concerning the …show more content…
This idea is displayed by the following statement; “And you have to understand this, that a prince, especially a new one, cannot observe all those things for which men are esteemed . . . to act contrary to faith, friendship, humanity, and religion.” Machiavelli is stating that in order to not lose control of power, one must go against personal beliefs. A rulers belief system and values will flow into the land they govern, and these values should be of great repute in order to set an example for the citizens. If someone is willing to go against their beliefs then they are really just a weak pawn and not worthy to
Machiavelli wrote “The Prince” as a guide for ruling, governing, and maintaining political power. The twenty-six chapters address the types of states, armies and military conduct, and the character of the ruler. Viewing the issues and methods from purely a way to secure the future and riches of the ruler, Machiavelli makes sense. However, looking at what makes a great ruler from the standpoint of more than just political gain, and maintaining wealth, the views of Machiavelli contain multiple flaws. Concerning the …show more content…
This idea is displayed by the following statement; “And you have to understand this, that a prince, especially a new one, cannot observe all those things for which men are esteemed . . . to act contrary to faith, friendship, humanity, and religion.” Machiavelli is stating that in order to not lose control of power, one must go against personal beliefs. A rulers belief system and values will flow into the land they govern, and these values should be of great repute in order to set an example for the citizens. If someone is willing to go against their beliefs then they are really just a weak pawn and not worthy to