Offshore Drill Pros And Cons

Improved Essays
Since the 1800s, natural resources have been collected from oceans by using offshore drills (Offshore). While this new innovation created jobs and bolstered coastal economies, it also produced a new, looming threat to marine wildlife and coastal economies. In 1967, the first major oil spill occurred off of the coast of the Isles of Scilly, when 38 million gallons of oil were spilled into surrounding waters. Including this incident, 36 major spills have occurred since 1967, exposing marine environments to at least one trillion gallons of oil (Oil). Now, it is being debated about whether or not to drill for natural resources off of the Southeastern Coast. In my opinion, companies should not be allowed to drill off of the Southeastern Coast because the benefits gained from drilling would not outweigh the detrimental environmental and economic impact. It is difficult to find a report which explicitly states the exact amounts of natural resources located off of the Southeastern coast, but there are a few places which reference what may be available. An article by Jaime McClain posted in August of 2015 states, “All of the economically recoverable oil and gas believed to exist off of South Carolina would last for only six days based on current domestic …show more content…
First, the collection of oil from the Southeastern Coast will add to the supply of American oil, and could possibly lower local gas prices (Pros). These rigs would create jobs for locals, and attract new residents as families move closer for work. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, in 2009, between 500 and 5,000 or more jobs have been brought to coastal communities which have oil rigs offshore (Fact). This would also help stimulate coastal economies. While it costs around $550,000 a day to run an oil rig, this cost would be covered by the company doing the drilling, and not the people in the communities affected

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    What is the environmental cost of drilling? Do we dare touch such a fragile ecosystem that could never resurrect itself just because “gas prices are too high?” Is mankind so greedy and superficial that we have to take away one the most vast and unique areas of the world just for our own benefit? These are some of the many argumentative questions rational, environmentally aware individuals are asking after a significant amount oil has been recorded under the layers of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I support the building of the Keystone XL pipeline because it will help out America in the future. Right now the future of the build is uncertain while it cannot get passed through the government. The Keystone XL pipeline can be beneficial for the U.S economically and environmentally. in multiple ways. The building of the Keystone XL pipeline will tremendously help the U.S in more than one way.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This would bring a significant increase to the states gross state product with increases to the state economy anticipated to extent well over $ 4 billion by 2035. In addition to that figure, hopes that the state/federal revenue sharing arrangement is authorized for the Atlantic coastal states, North Carolina could gain serious government revenues. “Under 37.5% revenue sharing structure, North Carolina state government revenues from bonuses, rents and royalties are projected to reach $855 million per year by 2035 and the cumulative effects on the state budget from 2017 to 2035 are projected to be nearly $4 billion.” (API, 2013) Cons of offshore oil drilling off the coast of North Carolina, • One major concern of offshore drilling is the potential of an oil spill of mass proportions or an oil blow out like the famous disaster from BP in the Gulf. “The significant die-off of whales and dolphins that began in 2010 continues today,” said Biedron.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This directly ties into if the benefit of drilling itself is economically worth while for the land. Also, the status of the environment is another important question that must be asked; and which species are directly affected by this drilling process in the Alaskan National Wildlife Refuge. This ultimately brings up a cost to the environment that must be found to also determine if the benefit of drilling will outweigh…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A recent study by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration on Opposing Viewpoints, monitoring gas wells in Weld County, Colorado, estimated that 4 percent of the methane produced by these wells is escaping into the atmosphere. The only way to stop climate change is to stop burning fossil fuels, not dig more up. Through air pollution, water contamination, and improper disposal of waste products, this type of drilling is causing great harm. Since they starting practicing “fracking”, there have…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The media only sees the money and oil/gas that the wells produce. But they overlook all of the effects it has on everything. The workers of those wells are almost always unprepared for their job by not wearing the right equipment and safety…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The truth is that until there is more data available to provide concrete proof of the dangers fracking presents, the drilling will continue. It is such a new issue that without extensive research,…

    • 2156 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This type of drilling has been used commercially for 65 years. The debate goes back and forth about whether fracking is safe or not. Natural gas Industry claims that fracking is completely safe because the shale formations lie far below the water table and pose no threat to groundwater which we use on daily bases: such as for drinking, showering, swimming, and a lot more. However,…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It has been long acknowledged that the Untied States is in need of finding a natural energy source in order to become a more sustainable country and to also become less dependent on the Middle East. Attaining natural gas and oil from shale is a game changer when it comes to energy production. However, this revolutionary approach has created environmental skepticism around how environmentally friendly and sustainable this practice actually is and the types of problems that could be associated with fracking as a practice. Hydraulic Fracking has become extremely controversial because of very serious potential environmental risks. Enormous amounts of water are used during the fracking process, which become polluted creating a high probability…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Oil and gas resources are very extensive, but the location, profitability, and feasibility of the well are not certain (Fitzgerald). Since fracking increases down whole surface area, fracking is making it more likely that natural gas will be located. Profiteers love this extra probability of success, and in the long run the success is what is going to help the world’s nonrenewable resources last…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the past several months, a somewhat concerning topic in the news has been reports of a large number of earthquakes in Oklahoma. In a region that normally has very little fault activity, this recent rise in seismic action has raised some eyebrows to an increasingly-common practice across our nation: hydraulic fracking. Currently, many people believe that the process of hydraulic fracturing (more commonly referred to as "fracking") is a major problem that needs to be stopped, causing hazards to health and the environment. Other people believe that fracking is the key to maintaining an edge in the oil industry and an economic boost, as well as providing an ample supply of fossil fuels from the deep deposits within our country. While both sides…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hydraulic Fracking is a controversial issue because so little is known about it. But Fracking is some people’s way of life so we can’t just take away their jobs because they have families to feed and to take care of. But on the other hand Destroying are environment and endangering the public isn’t right either just because we need natural gas. Everyone has a side and an opinion but before making your decision on what side you’re on you should always read about it and look up facts. Fracking shouldn’t be allowed in North Carolina because the people drilling aren’t responsible enough to take care of the people and the environment due to their lust for money.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Degradation In Louisiana

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This fish attracts gamers which fuels $1.3 billion of Louisiana's recreational fishing industry. Not only is it affecting the recreational revenue, it is also affecting the two biggest industries in Louisiana: the shipping and oil industry. In the oil industry, the marshes surround and protect the oil wells. Due to the death of the marshes, the wells are clearly exposed. The appearance of the wells can increase the number of oil spills, possibly more spills than the year of 2016.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brent Spar Case

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Brent Spar was first installed in Brent Field in June 1976 (Kirby 1998). This oil platform is designed as a huge floating production stage facility and owned by Shell and Esso for business purposes which including oil storage and tanker loading. After serving for 15 years, Shell decided to abandon the platform by dumping it into deep water sea with the approval of the UK Government (Kirby 1998). In 1995, Shell announced the granted dispose plan to the world. However, this has been strongly objected by the Greenpeace, other NGOs, European Ministers and the public. Many protests, campaigns against ocean dumping, and objection voices form the stakeholders have contributed to the reverser of Shell UK disposing decision (Greenpeace 2015).…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    New Zealand is renowned for its ‘green’ environment, a feature that is also largely responsible to attract tourists to its country, and export revenue, (GREENPEACE New Zealand, 2012). Further constructions of offshore drilling sites in New Zealand, increases the risk of oil spills on a large scale, (Rees & Sharp, 2011). This could increase the chance of potentially destroying wildlife and their habitats at a large scale. Marine life will be directly and immediately affected. This in turn will affect exports as it contributes to $1.2 to $1.5 billion of revenue per annum for New Zealand, (Fish.govt.nz, 2014).…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays