Art has multiple meanings depending on the artist, for me, art is the application of color in a scientific manner to create magic in a canvas. Art is harmony, but harmony that can be found in the science of color. As most of the artists that are part of the salon and those whose art is denied or ignored, I am a Parisian and an even though I am a very patriotic and conservative person, I utilized Art to evade traditionalism and to express my original style. I am a learner every day, but Art has been in my blood since I was a child, due to that my mother was my first drawing instructor at a really young age and At the age of 19, I enrolled in the school of fine arts of Paris, where I started perceiving Art through instructors and where I had
…show more content…
my first famous painting was the Bathers at Asnieres which obtained great admiration by the Parisian community due to the introduction of pointillism to the art world as my original movement and that it was possible to convert dots into forms due to the application of the color theory by utilizing complementary colors, analogous colors and various values to produce movement trough color These three years I have been changing and reaffirming my new powerful movement, pointillism. between the latter paintings it is possible to see the Eiffel Tower, The Sunday afternoon on the island of la Grande jatte, and Circus. Without any doubt my strongest piece is The Sunday Afternoon on the Island of la Grande Jatte that took me about two years to finish and it represents the social classes of this country with a dominance of the rich class portrayed. Every person included in it is preoccupied for their own business, it is easy to perceive a quietness in the atmosphere, but one of the interesting details of my painting is the little girl in white, who stares at the audience, which brings several questions to those who see her. The people in the painting surely illustrates a prepotent, materialistic rich Parisian class who is highly preoccupied about what people perceive …show more content…
Personally talking, color is what brings vivacity, movement and sentiments to my art and my style, but, the problem is that some people consider themselves artists and they argue that their ideas are what assure their artistry. However, like the Yin and Yan, what supports ideas in a painting is color. If you are an artist and you did something marvelous and do not how you did it, be worried, because Art is not only an expression of a five minute inspiration, it contains a technical and consistent part, that is why I argue that some say that they see poetry in my paintings, I see only science. The academy is an exemplification of conservatism that is becoming dogmatism. The fear to let art be transformed, or be free is not what the academy desires due to a traditional style that wants to be mastered but it was already mastered by multiple artists in the past. Another problem is highlighted when the academy rejects works by artists that at least have demonstrated talent to look forward in
my first famous painting was the Bathers at Asnieres which obtained great admiration by the Parisian community due to the introduction of pointillism to the art world as my original movement and that it was possible to convert dots into forms due to the application of the color theory by utilizing complementary colors, analogous colors and various values to produce movement trough color These three years I have been changing and reaffirming my new powerful movement, pointillism. between the latter paintings it is possible to see the Eiffel Tower, The Sunday afternoon on the island of la Grande jatte, and Circus. Without any doubt my strongest piece is The Sunday Afternoon on the Island of la Grande Jatte that took me about two years to finish and it represents the social classes of this country with a dominance of the rich class portrayed. Every person included in it is preoccupied for their own business, it is easy to perceive a quietness in the atmosphere, but one of the interesting details of my painting is the little girl in white, who stares at the audience, which brings several questions to those who see her. The people in the painting surely illustrates a prepotent, materialistic rich Parisian class who is highly preoccupied about what people perceive …show more content…
Personally talking, color is what brings vivacity, movement and sentiments to my art and my style, but, the problem is that some people consider themselves artists and they argue that their ideas are what assure their artistry. However, like the Yin and Yan, what supports ideas in a painting is color. If you are an artist and you did something marvelous and do not how you did it, be worried, because Art is not only an expression of a five minute inspiration, it contains a technical and consistent part, that is why I argue that some say that they see poetry in my paintings, I see only science. The academy is an exemplification of conservatism that is becoming dogmatism. The fear to let art be transformed, or be free is not what the academy desires due to a traditional style that wants to be mastered but it was already mastered by multiple artists in the past. Another problem is highlighted when the academy rejects works by artists that at least have demonstrated talent to look forward in