'Professionalism In Bonnie And Clyde'

We live in a time that movies reviews are being giving by normal people on social media leaving critics useless. When people write these reviews, the reviews are bias, racist, and unprofessional. In order to get a more professional, unbiased, and not racist reviews, people need to read real critics reviews. Whereas people like us who write movie reviews on social media such as Facebook, Yelp, Twitter, and etc. are called amateur critics. The difference between amateur critics and professional critic is the professionalism that a professional critic gives a review. Professional critics do not hold any value in today’s society because amateur critics reviews on movies have taken over all social media society. Even though critics take people right …show more content…
People always have this mind set that if they watch violent movies, then they would also become violent, but in reality that is not true. For the movie, Bonnie and Clyde people thought the violence in the was not acceptable at all because in peoples' eyes violent was not allowed since it would influence them in that way. On the other hand, critics do not have to think that way because critics know that movies cannot influence anyone decisions on them. Pauline Kale in review states that, “I think that "Bonnie and Clyde," though flawed, is a work of art,” (Kale). Pauline Kale considers this movie a work of art because she does not hold the belief like normal people do that a movie would will influence her actions in a certain way. In this situation people were not so accepting of the movie due to fact that they thought it will influence them in a bad way, whereas critics were more accepting since this movie was changing the direction of the film industry. In her review on the movie, Kale also states, “It is a kind of violence that says something to us; it is something that movies must be free to use. We must also defend the legal rights of those filmmakers who use violence to see tickets, for it is not province of the law to deice that one man is an artist and another man a no-talent,” (Kale). Pauline Kale in fourteen-page review on Bonnie and Clyde explains that a film director should not be limited to what they want in their movies because the audience is not willing to accept any violence in the movie, but instead that film maker should have the freedom to put whatever they want in their movies to entertain us. The reason why film directors are limited to what their film should have is because we as the audience tend to be more bias towards new things such as sexual scenes or violence that a movie has to offers than being more accepting of the sexuality