Pros And Cons Of The Declaration Of Independence

“Freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed” is stated by Martin Luther King, Jr. This powerful quote speaks for all thirteen colonies wanting to separate themselves from Great Britain. Fifty-six men were determined to fix multiple problems by introducing the fundamental ideas through a document. The belief brought to attention was all men are created free and equal and own the same inherent, natural rights. This treatment was not given to the colonies which forced them produce the declaration. The Declaration of Independence presents, through grievances, the abuses toward the colonies by King George III. The cruel acts the citizens of the colonies experienced were truly horrific, some more …show more content…
It suggests that the King of Great Britain has stirred up rebellions among the people and has gone about trying to convince the violent Indian populations to kill the people of the colonies. With gruesome violence, aimed towards the colonies, breaking out that is why this grievance is a part of my top three. In addition, because it was ordered by the King that makes it even worse. According to Brent Riggs, in his article “Declaration of Independence: A Modern English Rewrite," the Indians are well known to have only one rule of warfare: kill every man, woman and child without mercy no matter what their age or physical condition. This abuse now seems to be even more hostile. The citizens of the colonies were in a dreadful situation, and had no way to prevent it. The twenty-seventh abuse is a huge reason for the colonies to be demanding their freedom. This offense is shocking because of the fact that King George III actually persuaded the Native Americans to kill innocent people. Just because the men and women of the colonies wanted freedom from the unjust acts does not mean death should be placed upon them. The King could have simply warned them, and if he really demanded punishment, it should've been much less