Socrates Moderation Of The Soul

Improved Essays
First, we will take a look at chapter 6 of Plato’s Republic, Socrates discusses the three parts of the soul: reason, thymos, and passions. The reason represents the mind with the ergon of thinking and arête is wisdom. The reason part deals with knowledge, argument, and persuasion, to be able to drive the soul by controlling the other two parts. As expected the reason focuses on what is in the best interest of the self in matters of the soul. The thymos represents the heart; its ergon is will and arête courage. In moderation, it completes its arête function, but it can cause for reactions such as anger and cowardness when flawed. Courage allows an individual to overcome dear and challenges presented. Finally, the passion represents the physical …show more content…
Socrates argues that justice can only be realized through the moderation of the soul. Again, this will be reflected upon the city. Glaucon and Ademantus argue that the benefit or lack of justice does not always affects a person’s happiness. They start off with a positive view of justice where Glaucon wants Socrates to prove that it is good. Glaucon makes the point that if it is just to do wrong in order to achieve justice, then a man who lies or cheats but is a respected person, is living a just life. This is when Socrates brings in the comparison of the three parts of the soul to the city. Socrates speaks of three cities: the cities of necessity, luxury, and fever. The city of necessity only contains what is needed for survival, such as food, shelter, and clothing. Of course, this city will need laborers to produce the necessary materials. Eventually, the laborers produce more than what is consumed and expand to comfort, creating a city of luxury. This city desires more such as larger more comfortable houses and furniture. The demand for luxury leads to a feverish city in which the desires of the people cannot be completely fulfilled causing unhappiness among the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Rep. IV at 436b-c, Socrates puts forth the the principle of division. This principle provides a means to rationally and plausibly divide the soul into parts. Socrates states that the “same thing will not be willing to do or undergo opposites in the same part of itself, in relation to the same thing, at the same time” (436b). What this means is that a single body can not have opposite processes that occur simultaneously. For example, Socrates provides the example of someone who is standing still while their hands and head move (436c).…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophy For The State In the Apology of Socrates and Republic, it is argued that philosophy is beneficial for the state. Advantageous can be considered an outcome that is profitable. A state is an area controlled by a ruler. Therefore, the question is whether philosophy is a reasonable method of ruling an area and in what ways.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s Republic, Socrates establishes a soul with three parts to it: a calculative, a spirited, and a desiderative. The calculative contains the knowledge of good and bad, the spirited part contains the courage to carry out the will of the calculative, and the desiderative seeks those animalisitc neccesities such as food and drink. Socrates establishes an aspect of the soul that is distinct from the other parts, when he says, “Isn’t there something in their soul binding them to drink and something forbidding them to do so, something different that masters that which bids?” Socrates goes on to further say, “doesn’t that which forbids such things come into being - when it comes into being - from calculation, while what leads and draws is present due to affections and diseases?” One can clearly see how the calculative part is meant to guide and drive both the desiderative and the spirited parts of the one’s soul.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Socrates is trying explain is that justice can be more than the consequence. It is a good that will make you happier let your soul live well. It is a virtue in allowing to better the…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Glaucon Vs Socrates

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Socrates concludes that justice will need to be follow in the individual, then into the community [1]. Glaucon and Socrates both make strong arguments of justice and injustice, but Glaucon may have a slight edge over the…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although this answer is sufficient and addresses many of the claims and suppositions upon which Glaucon bases his argument, Socrates’ response can seem uncharacteristic when compared to other works where he is mentioned. In the Apology, for instance, Socrates does not liken justice to a balance between reason and desire within the mind, but as the result of a lifelong quest for the truth. Socrates has been quoted as saying, “there is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance.” If goodness, which can be interpreted to also apply to justice, stems from knowledge, then it does not necessarily follow that it takes a mind balanced with reason to behave justly. By this notion, a knowledgeable person cannot commit injustice, as that would…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this model, both justice and injustice have been forgotten, and it is not until Glaucon’s suggestion of luxuries and opulence that these contrasting ideals seem to come into perspective. This alludes to the notion that when wants, such as luxuries and desires, are introduced into the city, is when the concept of injustice is introduced. By creating circumstances that lead others to develop jealousy and greed, it ultimately stimulates the manipulation of unjust acts. Due to this realization, Socrates has created a just city that is only based on needs and diminishes the idea of wants. Therefore, he concludes that justice within a city is a means and an end and preserves the duty of the citizens to themselves as well as others.…

    • 2787 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socrates first questions the wise of the city. He discovers that the politicians, poets, and artisans all think that “because they [are] good [at one thing] … they also [know] all sorts of high matters” (Apology of Socrates 4). Socrates’ questioning of the honorable politicians threatens their honor and laws of the city. His questioning of the poets threatens their culture and, therefore, the culture of the city. Additionally, his questioning of the artisans threatens their accomplishments in their field and therefore the city’s idea of masters.…

    • 1115 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this reading, Glaucon, a ‘just’ man and apprentice to Socrates, becomes disappointed with Thrasymachus’ abrupt and willingness in defeat. Glaucon, plays devil’s advocate and challenges his successor; Socrates, to a friendly debate. To start the debate of why the ‘just’ man is the best, rather than, ‘unjust’. Glaucon also discusses the best/worst life and how justice is a compromise.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, Socrates will try to argue that a city is necessary because humans need to rely on one another in order to accomplish tasks. Socrates begins his argument when he states, “So if you approve, why don’t we start by finding out what sort of thing it is in cities? After that we can make a similar inquiry into the individual, trying to find the likeness of the larger version in the form the smaller takes” (line 369). He first proposes the dissection of a city. First, you must look for justice in the city, and once you have evidence of justice in the city, then you can continue to further your search for by analyzing the citizens for justice.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glaucon Vs Plato

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Plato's The Republic: Book II, Glaucon wants to know what the meaning of justice is so he goes on to converse more about the just and unjust with Socrates. Glaucon starts off by saying that he believes that there are three types of classes that can define good. The first one is the things that one desires because of the consequences, the second one is the things that one wants for their own interest, and the third one is the things we want for both, the consequences and interest. What Glaucon is trying to prove to Socrates is that for humans to be unjust is more desirable than to be just and that it is reasonable for humans to think so. In this essay I will analyze Galucon's reasons to his statement and counter argue his points.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates proposes first to search for Justice in the city because it is easier to determine what just is as a whole than in the individual and begins specifying what the Ideal City needs. The first city provides necessities of life, such as food, shelter, and clothing. One of the most important aspects of the Ideal City is the idea that each individual specializes in a particular role. Socrates calls this city the Healthy City because it is governed only for necessary desires. The Healthy City only produces what is necessary for life.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He goes on to add that the natural attachment of spirit and honor and to recognize the esteem of others (Republic, 581a). He adds that the soul is oftentimes responsible for self-assertion and ambition. When the soul’s desires aren’t met, we oftentimes react with emotional responses such as anger and leads to behavior that naturally flows from these responses. Socrates adds that spirit is the natural ally of reason and part of its function is to support reason between it and our appetites (Republic, 440ef, 442ab). To assign the soul this function is not to say that the corrupt or unjust soul can turn against reason.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    His main goal is to show the reader or his audience that it pays to be a just person even if the reward is not instant. In Socrates mind a just man is a philosopher king, who is essentially a smart thinker who does what is best for the community. When everyone follows this social order that Socrates proposes, it is possible for everyone to play their part and this gives way for the leaders to be philosopher kings who are the most intelligent thinkers. This ‘Kaliipolis’ is a city where the rulers crave knowledge, unlike a democracy where the ‘mob’ mentality rules causing the unfit to rule. He explains by stating, “Don’t understand that a little captain must pay attention to all seasons of the year, the sky, the star, to winds, and all that pertains to his craft, if he’s really to be the ruler of the ship” (Plato, 2004,448).…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato had many ideas about human nature, but his stemmed from a route that many Philoshipers failed to examine. Plato believed that Human nature had much more to do with our souls then our bodies. Plato states that the principal task of the soul is to pursue knowledge this we can decipher from the Allegory of the cave. Although Plato believed that the soul has three parts the Logical part, the Spirited and the Appetitive. The Logical part of the soul is responsible for the search for knowledge and truth, while the spirited part Plato identified with anger and temper, lastly the appetitive part of the soul Is responsible for love, sex, hunger and thirst; Plato theorised that the appetitive is generally opposed to the logical side of the soul.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays