In this case of Illinois v. Wardlow, Sam Wardlow, a 44-year old black man was wrongly searched after he was apparently seen acting ‘suspicious’ when he ran after he saw four police cars driving up. He was then chased by Timothy Nolan, a veteran police officer, as he believed Wardlow as guilty. The officers believed him to be in a ‘high crime area’. They caught up to Wardlow and frisked him. During the search, they found a handgun.…
In particular the question arises if it is a violation of “Stop and Frisk” under the Fourth Amendment based on the suspicions of the officer at the time of the immediate contact with the petitioner. The issue specifically refers to whether the officer in this case had the right to “Stop and Frisk” the subject without probable cause based on the observations of the officer and recovered dangerous weapons from the subjects…
On the issue of Racial profiling, it is hard to identify the reasoning behind someone’s decision to be just that. The reason being that we do not have access to everyone's thoughts. However, after a series of statistics, it seems that the idea of the presence and actions upon someone who has a set of stereotypical thoughts is no longer dismissible. Although the “stop-and-frisk” technique has made several cities safer, there seems to be a trend in a group of races and a lack in one specific race.…
According to NYPD statistics, police stopped New Yorkers 97,296 times that year. This number increased steadily, reaching a record 685,724 stops in 2011. Following the lead set by the NYPD, police departments in major American cities including Philadelphia, Los Angeles, and Chicago have adopted similar tactics.” (Engler; editor of “Debating “Stop and Frisk”: Race, Rights, and Law…
Introduction Secrecy is a common factor in the government, they will always hide something from society. It could be to protect us or just to avoid something even bigger. A police officer role is to “serve and protect the community” by enforcing the law in a safe way to those that break it. Every citizen have the right to be treated fairly in this country. Police officers are supposed to help the community follow the law, by making sure that everything is in order and no one is acting illegal.…
Stop and Frisk states that police is able to stop and search someone based on a suspicion that this person is involved in criminal activity. The 4th amendment states that police is allowed to search someone if they have the reasonable believe that this person is committing, has committed or is going to commit a crime. This search consists of a quick pat down of the outer clothing. Stop and Frisk started with the Terry vs. Ohio case, in 1976, in which a police officer suspected three men of being about to commit a crime. The officer pointed his gun at them in order to search them.…
He performed a frisk and discovered illegal concealed weapons. The three men were convicted and appealed claiming that the frisk violated their Fourth Amendment right. The Supreme Court did not overturn the conviction, stating that the law enforcement officer had "reasonable grounds" for suspecting that a criminal suspect may be armed, he may pat down the outer layer of the suspect's clothing for weapons. This outcome represents a ruling that was made in the interest of the Common…
This is not the reality because police frisks can turn rough where a person may even be shoved against a police patrol vehicle. Furthermore, the author persuades the audience to support the argument and assumes that the reader will not be a likely target. This is because he indicates that the targets will be individuals on probation or parole or people belonging to a gang that is known to deal with drugs or assaults. In this manner, Wilson appeals to the audience to embrace his argument, but there are no enough reasons why his claims should be supported.…
It is just a form of racial profiling because over half the percent of people they stop are African Americans. We are suspected to have some form of a weapon on contraband, or us and if it just happened that someone they stopped and frisked did they would get charged. In these cases whites never seem to cause suspicious among cops. It is easier for police to just be able to go into urban areas and criminalize the people there because it is cheaper for their police force than to go into suburban areas where there can be drugs or contraband inside of there houses and having to look into many of the crimes police would need a search warrant because the crimes in these areas are typically done behind closed doors. Because we look suspicious to a specific police officer they take this as an advantage and use this as a style of policing it gives them to right to just stop and search me as If I was a criminal.…
Racial profiling is seen on a regular basis in traffic stops. This discrimination within the criminal justice system is composed of mainly African Americans and Hispanics. These minorities are targeted within the streets as criminals by police officers. A video from The Orland Sentinel showed major evidence of racial profiling by police. Within the video, there were more than one thousand people’s roadside stops shown.…
Racial Profiling Introduction Have you ever been racially profiled? Do you even understand why officers tend to racial profile certain individual (e.g.; African American, and Mexicans)? Well, if you have never been racially profile you are lucky or just a Caucasian. To this learner, she has been racial profile the majority of her life, but one thing I was fortunate to learn is that it is not this learner who is the problem, but the color of her skin and the system that allows it to continue to happen in regards to racial profiling. Within this discussion this learner will address racial profiling and if it still exists, public policy implications of racial profiling, constitutional issues surrounding racial profiling, and what can police agencies…
The only reason why people are against “stop and frisk” is because the people believe that it’s unconstitutional. They think that “stop and frisk” is an invasion of privacy, which could be true, but the Second Court of Appeals decision said that stop and frisk is constitutional and plays a critical role in saving lives…
Crime in the United States has been very bad in the last couple decades, though in the more recent years’ crime has been steadily decreasing. The police have been implementing a way of reducing crime by using the method of stop and frisk mostly in cities such as New York City or Chicago which are more prominently used. Stop and frisk is when a police officer has reasonable suspicion that a crime is going to happen, about to happen, or has happened before stopping a suspect. The officer then goes on to do a quick pat down to see if they have anything suspicious on them. There are different points of view of whether or not the act of stop and frisk should be legal or not.…
This brings the topic of racial profiling forward. Racial profiling is the system taking actions or certain behaviors out on an individual not for their actions, but purely on the fact of their race. Racial profiling is outlawed in many states in America; however, this does not mean that racial profiling is not still present within the states. It is the systems job to uphold the law and protect citizens while treating them justly, but unfortunately there are some that will shout probable cause for a stop and search, when the only reasoning behind it is…
Introduction Stop and frisk tactics have been used to preserve public safety and officer well-being. A stop and frisk is a non-intrusive police stop and pat-down based on the reasonable suspicion in relation to a crime that has happened, will happen, or is in the process of being carried out (Cornell Law School, 2017). Stop and frisk situations are highly common and the reported instances have increased by approximately 7% annually (Hovhannisyan, 2006). However, the approach is highly controversial because it operates primarily on officers' perceptions and opinions, which opens the door to personal prejudices dictating the usage. This executive summary includes the advantages and disadvantages involved in stop and frisk procedures as well as the constitutionality and recommendations to improve the approach.…