Should Democratization Be Promoted In Foreign Policy Essay

Improved Essays
Should democratization be be promoted in foreign policy? If the goal is to improve is to improve human rights conditions, absolutely! Democracies without question tend to have better human rights conditions compared to countries that are not democracies. Democracies foster the adoption of better human rights practices, less repressive regimes, and often lead to better economic stability. However, it is important to understand how democracies do this and if there are any complications of that process. It is important to understand exactly what a democracy is. A democracy is a political system in which candidates compete for political office through frequent, fair elections in which a large portion of the adult population can vote. Democracy …show more content…
Davenport and Armstrong also studied the correlation of democracy and the amount of repression of human rights. In their findings, they discovered that democracy has little effect on reducing oppression until democracy has reached a certain “critical level”. After this level had been reached, constraints on authorities are increased, and the likelihood of repression is decreased: “[The] results disclose that at lower and middle levels of democracy, there seems to be no systematic impact on human rights violations. After democracy has reached a critical level, however, the impact on repression appears to be negative and roughly linear” (Davenport 548). BdM et al also concludes that new or transitional democracies often do not see immediate positive results. Further, they conclude that new democracies do not see major gains for human rights until party stabilization occurs and peaceful elections can proceed.
In essence, although democracies coincide with better conditions for human rights and less repression, there is a bumpy road to get to that point, and countries transitioning into democracies often do not see the full results until they reach a certain level in the democratization process. Does this mean that democratization should not be promoted? No, because although there may be problems along the way, a state
…show more content…
I would ask the leaders of any country what is more important: promoting and preserving freedom, or preserving safety? Unfortunately, I think all to often we sacrifice freedom in the name of security. However, human freedom is of the utmost importance in this world. And if there is any way to promote more freedom, then I think it is within the power of every capable leader to promote a system that has been demonstrated to be a net positive, in the long run, for human

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Bostonistan Case Study

    • 2073 Words
    • 9 Pages

    A stable democracy typically is better off financially, less likely to go to war and better positioned to fight corruption. This is why states across the globe stride toward a democracy and depending on circumstances fail. For example, Bostonistan and Germany, established democracy, but due to divided parties and gridlock this form of government was no longer acceptable. There is no variation of democracy that ensures success, however it will triumph when the right systems align with the citizens ' values and states history. From there the Government’s commitment to root out corruption, abandon failed old practices, and take account public interest will lead to a steady successful state.…

    • 2073 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first thing that comes to mind when thinking about democracy is a government by the people. For me it’s about people coming together and having equal voices in shaping policies. Democracy is simply just having a voice and using it. It’s a way to decide what you want without having someone else to decide for you. Without a democracy, our our basic human rights would be non existent.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chapter 5 Of Dahl Summary

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In chapter 5 of Dahl, he discusses the different associations through which governments practice is rules. He discusses the different government systems, and the main reasons why a democratic government is the best way of governing compared to alternatives. Democracy refers to governments that meet a specific criteria. In the previous chapters, he discusses how a government can never be totally democratic because it is impossible to meet every single criteria, but a system of governing can in fact be more democratic than others. Dahl discusses ten advantages of governing a state democratically.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Becker illustrate the meaning of democracy by comparing its definition with other system leadership that existed at the time. According to Becker a democratic government is a government in which citizens or an adequate numbers of them are accorded rights and responsibilities to determine intricate procedure and regulations that are valid for the governing of a country or state. Becker also note such a definition however positive in nature stand to be contradicted by the present condition of the citizens. He acknowledges that democracy t survive, certain conditions need to be observed. In others hand Becker acknowledges that the conditions required for democracy to prosper settle with mobility, necessary of economic security, ease communication and industrial prosperity.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    After World War One, there were many types of new government that emerged from the chaos of the war. But, the two major governments were dictatorships and democracies. In Germany, Italy and Russia, the dictators Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini and Josef Stalin came to power after the fall of democracy in each country. There were many reasons for the change to dictatorship, including inflation, unemployment and a lost sense of trust in democracy. These dictatorships ruled for many years during the interwar period.…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Nor is it likely that democratization would end the current campaign against the United States. Al Qaeda and like­minded groups are not fighting for democracy in the muslim world; they are fighting to impose their vision of an Islamic state. I believe that as Americans, we want everyone to experience the unbounded exercise of reason and freedom of opinion that we have. It 's impossible to untangle the contradictions of American freedom without thinking about Jefferson and the spiritual abyss that separates his pronouncement that "all men are created equal" from the reality of the human beings he owned and never imagined as fellow citizens.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard, quote “Promoting democracy may usher in a more peaceful world; It will also enhance the national security of the United Statesby eliminating potential military threats. The United States would be more secure if Russia, China, and… countries in the Arab and Islamic worlds became stable democracies.” end quote. When there are more democratic countries, the United States will also have more chances at having a greater number of allies, considering that most of America’s allies are…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robert Dahl On Democracy

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In modern thought, democracy is considered as the ideal form of governance; it is a tool to usher in freedom and progress to citizens of a state. While the term “democracy” is used liberally to describe a wide array of governing systems, it is assumed that most “democratic” governments share similar principles that highlight individual freedoms. Robert Dahl, in On Democracy, makes his case for the democratic system. Dahl argues throughout the book that democracy should not just be viewed as desirable; democracy is the most viable governing option for the modern state. Therefore, achieving the highest levels of democratization ought to be the goal of all governments that are considered democracies.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Envision a society in which everyone was effortlessly free to do as they please. Order indicates an essential loss of freedom, if people are to live. Democratic countries appreciate freedom and commonly believe that laws should not be authoritarian; a slight quantity of order can be surrendered in the name of liberty. I would argue that Democratic societies also anticipate another kind of stability, a intervention between liberty and equality. A sufficient amount of liberty sensibly leads to inequality, resilient or determined individual might obtain more goods and property than another individual, and someone is guaranteed to govern.…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    My research question is important because it would suggest that the best option for all is not a transition to democracy. Transitions to democracy are often followed by a decrease in violence. Also, through the competitive nature of democracy, there is less corruption found within the government. This question can help to answer the theoretical quandary that has occurred from the democratization of Mexico.…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Adams, the second President of the United States once said, “Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide”. In this quote, Adams explicitly acknowledges that democracies always eventually collapse. Adams included the words ‘murders’ and ‘suicide’ in his diction to imply that once a democracy collapses, it turns into extreme chaos.…

    • 1493 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many studies have shown that democracy brings economic and social benefits for its citizens. The fact that poor democracies frequently outdo poor autocracies in bringing services and human well-being shows how strong this case is. Lekvall (2013:29) argues that outside Eastern Asia, ‘the median per capita growth rates of poor democracies have been 50 per cent higher than those of autocracies. Moreover, the risk that poor autocracies will experience severe economic contractions is twice that of poor democracies. The quality of life in poor democracies is significantly better than in poor…

    • 1947 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Steven Levitsky’s and Lucan A. Way’s “International Linkage and Democratization” explains, how increased ‘linkage’, meaning the intensification of relations and growing ties, with powerful institutions such as the EU, determines the accelerating democratization of authoritarian regimes. Levitsky and Way, claim that after the Cold War most former authoritarian regimes adopted formal democratic institutions; however, most of these regimes did not truly become democracies but remained autocratic in practice. Levitsky and Way, defined such regimes as ‘competitive authoritarian regimes’. After the cold war, such regimes could be found globally; however, some regions such as Latin America and Central Europe transformed into democracies; whereas,…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The article declares that among the countries that are in some transitional phase between dictatorship and democracy “fifty percent do better on political liberties than on civil ones” (Zakaria). The author Fareed Zakaria called these countries illiberal democracies. According to him this form of democracy is typical for non-Western countries which embraced it from France (the French model). Although these countries are democracies, according to their official form of government, but in practice the leaders of these countries abuse the power and the citizens have many of their rights limited or violated. All the power is usually concentrated in the hands of one and the same person.…

    • 2348 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jeffery Frieden, author of World Politics, supports this when he argues established democracies are less likely to ratify treaties because human rights are already secured through constitutional protections (Frieden). In other words, established democracies already respect human rights. Emilie M. Hafner-Burton, Political scientist professor at Princeton University, claims mature democracies and dictatorships have less reason to sign treaties because membership infringes on their sovereignty and requires them to commit resources, with few benefits (Burton). Established states feel that they have nothing to prove. They don’t have an interest in choosing to enter regimes designed to establish and monitor compliance with human rights standards because they know international legal arrangements are weak, enforcement is unlikely, and any costs of noncompliance are…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics