The Trolley Problem, Proposed By Philippa Foot And Judith Jarvis Thomson: An Analysis

Improved Essays
Widely accepted ethical principles are key when it comes to making moral judgments. Lin (2015) explains that ethics often conflict with the laws, and rational decisions can make one take illegal actions. Gracyk (2015) writes that based on the principle of beneficence, we should take good actions. In addition, Gracyk (2015) states that the principle of non-maleficence emphasizes the idea of not harming others and minimizing the harm in events of unavoidable incidents. Ultimately, Gracyk (2015) brings up the point that our actions should do more good than harm. Lin (2015) points out that when dealing with deaths, the numbers do not indicate anything as there are many other complicated factors involved. The Trolley Problem, proposed by Philippa Foot and Judith Jarvis Thomson, highlights the moral differences between letting someone die and killing someone (as cited in Lin, 2015). …show more content…
Fully automatic cars cannot always be safe, and it is difficult to program the way a self-driving car behaves in the cases of unavoidable accidents (“Why Self-Driving Cars,” 2015). Knight (2015) writes that when it comes to complex situations that involve split-second decisions, ethical considerations need to be taken into account. Additionally, Adriano Alessandrini says that there will be ethical dilemmas when a car is asked to make decisions (as cited in Knight, 2015). Bonnefon and co point out that complex situations raises ethical questions such as should the car minimize the total number of deaths, should the car prioritize the life of its driver at all cost, or should the car respond differently based on the different situations and the probability of survival for the parties involved (“Why Self-Driving Cars,”

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Trolley Problem Summary

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages

    With a snappy title like, “Compassion, Technology and World Peace” Andre Averbug brings to attention the “trolley problem” in ethics. Embedded in the article, the author places a Wikipedia link for the readers to further understand the trolley problem (coined by Philippa Foot in 1967).The premise of the trolley problem is that there are two tracks. On the first track there is a train headed towards a group of five people and on the second is one person. Whoever is being asked the question must decide whether or not to pull a lever that results in the train diverting and killing the single person rather than the five.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Due to this abnormal discrepancy, the car remained in motion, causing a crash with the other driver, and two people died in the incident, as well as three were injured. Men are sentimental beings, who can process current information faster, and understand the road structure more fluently. From this a machine like a self driving car is only going to understand what its code is telling the device. Currently, that code is only going to say the basic patterns and situations that are common in driving. The machine itself lacks the creativity to decide whether or not a certain and specific action shall be taken.…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Self-driving cars Self-Driving Cars are becoming the newest cause for controversy on whether or not they should be driven in public. There is an argument for both, but Self-Driving cars should not be driven in public. These cars are going to make traffic even more dangerous. First, an argument that many people have said is that the technology just is not safe.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In The Ethical Dilemma of Self-Driving Cars they ask you to imagine that a sudden accident happens in front of you and you don't have enough time to break would…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My Opposition to Automotive Autonomy Autonomous vehicles are the new hot commodity in American society, and the potential effects of these cars’ release are highly controversial. Due to constant production and elaborate marketing strategies, the automotive industry has been attracting customers since the early twentieth century. Manufacturers are constantly updating automobiles, so consumers are always interested in the new styles and abilities of cars; which ultimately make their lives easier. In “I’m Not Sold on Self-Driving Cars”, author Mark Buchanan expresses his disapproval of the most sought-after release yet; autonomous automobiles. Buchanan is concerned that the presence of fully autonomous vehicles on public roadways will increase traffic, further complicating varying road conditions.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In fact, in light of Singer's paper, the 'utilitarian' actions in many recent papers on self-driving cars seem to promote a severe form of risk pooling, in which pedestrians would loose a significant disincentive to behave prudently when crossing roads. That is, if a self-driving car will sacrifice its passenger to avoid two or more pedestrians, some pedestrians, much like the gluttons, will see the chance of arriving at their destinations quicker by abandoning traffic rules, while having little risk of being injured by a vehicle. Meanwhile, passengers of self-driving cars will face the possibility of being sacrificed for someone else's impatience and thoughtlessness. Therefore, those considering self-driving cars, not to mention those who already possess one, are likely to reject such technology and revert back to conventional vehicles. Given that research (Bonnefon et al. 2016) has shown people favour self-protective algorithms for themselves, not to mention that they see the sacrifice of a family member or friend as reprehensible (Sachdeva et al. 2015), it is too great a burden to ask people to accept the cost of injury and death for them and their loved ones, when that would include scenarios involving…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the driver had the responsibility of programming his or her own autonomous vehicle, it would seem that a self-protecting…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When people are talking about dealing with death, how a death comes about, whether die of natural causes, suicide, accident, or murdering, matters a lot. The trolley problem proposed by Judith Jarvis Thomson in 1976 gives me an opportunity to make a distinction between cases with similar situations but opposite results. I agree with Judith Jarvis Thomson’s opinion about the trolley problem which was presented in her later paper published in 1985. Thomson (1985) attempts to show that it is morally permissible to divert what will be a threat to many onto a few if this is done in ways which do not themselves constitute violation of stringent rights.…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These four principles help break contradicting opinions down into a more factual and evidence-based structure that can effectively explain the ethics and morality that society has towards certain issues. Each principle states that people have an obligation and a duty towards a certain person. According to Theodore Gracyk, an accomplished author and director of the philosophy department at Minnesota State University, the first principle is known as the principle of respect for autonomy; it states that people have an obligation to respect the decisions that others make concerning their lives and beliefs (“Four Fundamental Ethical Principles”). For example, if a person makes the decision to start exercising in order to lose weight, then others have to respect that decision and interpret it as a means of trying to improve their lifestyle. Another principle is known as the the principle of beneficence and it states that people have an obligation to bring about good in all their actions (Gracyk, “Four Fundamental Ethical Principles”).…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ford Ethical Dilemmas

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When it comes to the auto industry, one of the largest ethical questions is whether a company can put a dollar amount on human lives. Throughout the history of the automobile industry, there is to be case after case where automotive manufactures try to walk the fine line of using specific parts in a car to try and lower their costs, but also while making the vehicle more dangerous for the passengers. The idea of safety versus cost in the industry has many factors that must be considered to fully understand the ethical dilemmas. Multiple stakeholders are affected by the safety versus cost dilemma. The most important stakeholder in the case of safety versus cost is the customer.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A trolley is moving down a track. The trolley can not be stopped, but it a nearby switch is able to move the trolley from one track to another. One track has five people, and the other has one. Flipping the nearby switch will cause the one person to die while leaving the switch alone will mean the five people will die. The question is: what would you do?…

    • 1508 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Counter Argument: You may think that Autonomous cars are the key getting home safe but it’s not. These vehicles are unreliable because they are technology and you can never fully rely on that. “Autonomous cars will need to store a fair amount of information about various routes traveled, as well as relay certain information to other vehicles and servers. It's hardly new information that the government can track your license plate nowadays, but autonomous cars will make it simpler and more accessible than ever for Big Brother to follow your every move” say Aaron Miller. What were to happen if your autonomous car was having a glitch and the detector broke.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The first Dilemma is The Runaway Trolley. In short, The Runaway Trolley deals with a complex situation where Molly needs to push a stranger onto the tracks to prevent the trolley from killing five workmen. If she does not push the stranger the five workers will die. According to the Utilitarianism, a philosophical school of thought, Molly should push the stranger onto the tracks to save the five workers. Utilitarianism would argue that five lives is greater than one.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Principles of Ethics include nonmaleficence, beneficence, autonomy, and justice. Nonmaleficence is the act of doing no harm, which is a foundational saying in medicine otherwise known as “first do no harm” or “primum non nocere” in Latin. Beneficence is the act of doing good, demonstrating kindness, and showing compassion to help others. Autonomy is self rule because each individual has the right to make their own decisions. Justice is the obligation to be fair in distribution of benefits and risks and treat persons in similar situations similarly.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I will argue that Utilitarianism will never be seen as the correct moral philosophy and with good reason. Throughout this paper, I will be talking about the Trolley Problem developed by British philosophy Philippa Foot in 1967. This problem, in its simplest form, is deciding whether it is more morally correct to passively kill five people or actively kill one person. For the purposes of my depiction of it, the notion of actively versus passively killing someone will not be relevant for the moment. Instead, it will should always be assumed that this fact isn’t important, it just is a matter of which group dies and which group lives.…

    • 1809 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays