Analysis Of We Should All Be Feminist By Chaimanda Agnozi Uganda

This excerpt is taken from a book named “We should all be feminist” written by “Chaimanda Agnozi Uganda”. This book contains evidences and explains the grievances of the marginalized segment of society that is women which is more than half of population of mankind. Women aren’t treated in the same way as men are treated in our society. Men are always considered as for job and money earning machines while women are restricted to four walls of home. The waiter in hotels always greet men and ignores the women accompanying him. This is a sort of discrimination rampant in our society. This problem needs to be addressed. Depriving women of their due rights is unacceptable. This is the gross violation of humankind the world has ever experienced. …show more content…
Actually, boys are held as much as accountable for virginity as girls are held for virginity and the laws of no land allows boys for sex and doesn’t police the virginity of woman. Does she gives an assumption by this writing is that a women should be allowed for losing virginity. She hasn’t defined in clear terms. She says that we advise women to cover herself. There is nothing harm in this. It is natural that a human should cover himself as it is a thing that differentiates a human from animal. A human weather a male or female looks more attractive in clothing and when he is dressed properly. One should always cover him/herself as being naked is unethical. The writer says that it is job of woman to cook and a male feels shames in cooking. So, there is nothing shame in cooking either for a man or woman. A man usually buys ingredients from stores for cooking. Does this make him shame? Husband and wife should do their jobs together. There is no purpose of writing a sentence here that all famous chefs of the world are man. The writer supports only femininity. This isn’t a good idea. A woman should have value for men rights as much as she has value for women rights. This biased support would only create a rift between men and women. There is no purpose of writing the story of a daughter and son of a woman. The mother advises her daughter to cook noodles for her brother. One shouldn’t feel shame in it as it furthers increases love between men and women. She only mentions the grievances of her daughter. She should have also mentioned here the tiresome effort of son to fetch noodle from a shop. This story tends to be more harm for our existing family system as cooking shouldn’t be considered as liability. This action could increase the love between brother and sister. If she had written that all the task, i.e. buying noodles from shop and cooking was done by