Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
18 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Equivocation
|
Changing the meaning of terms during the argument
|
|
Amphiboly
|
Using language in such a way that allows statements to have more than one meaning
|
|
Composition
|
Saying that what is true of an individual part of something is true of the entire thing
|
|
Division
|
Saying that what is true of an entire thing is true of each individual
|
|
Accent
|
Using vocal emphasis to create statements with more than one meaning
|
|
Figure of Speech
|
Treating figurative statements as if they were literal
|
|
Accident
|
Treating an inessential quality of something as if it were an essential quality
|
|
Secundum quid
|
Arguing for generalization without a sufficient basis for generalization
|
|
Anecdotal Evidence
|
Evidence in the form of an anecdote or hearsay is called anecdotal if there is doubt about its veracity; the evidence itself is considered untrustworthy.
|
|
Ignoratio el enchi
|
Ignorance of the rules and procedures of evidence
|
|
Begging the Question
|
Asking the respondent to grant the very proposition in dispute.
|
|
Affirming the Consequent
|
In the argument form "if A and B," getting the respondent to grant B and using that concession as proof of A
|
|
False Cause
|
Falsely identifying one event as the cause of another
|
|
Many Questions
|
Explicitly or implicitly asking multiple questions at once so a straightforward yes or no answer cannot answer all of the questions
|
|
Hasty Generalization
|
I had three engineers in my class last semester and they all worked very hard. Thus, all engineers work very hard.
|
|
Informal Fallacies
|
Reasoning and evidence
|
|
Formal Fallacies
|
Regarding formal logic
|
|
Non Sequitur Fallacy
|
Evidence and reasoning do not pertain to claim.
|