Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
140 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
4 Sources of American Law
|
1. Constitutional Law
2. Statutory Law 3.Administrative Law 4. Common Law |
|
Constitutional law
|
Fundamental laws from state and federal constitution that establish authority for fovernment and organize the government
|
|
Statutory Law
|
laws set forth by legislative bodies
|
|
Administrative Law
|
laws set forth by an administrative agency
|
|
Common Law
|
evolving set of laws established by precedent
|
|
Stare decisis
|
common law principle by which precedents within jurisdiction become binding
|
|
Example of common law
|
roe v. wade: abortion rights
brown v. board of education: separate but equal not legal |
|
ethics
|
right and wrong behavior in society
|
|
business ethics
|
right and wrong behavior in business
|
|
minimum standard/ moral minimum
|
law is the absolute minimum standard for ethical behavior in business
|
|
Categorical Imperative
|
concept developed by Immanual Kant as an ethical guideline for behavior
|
|
Outcome based Ethics
|
1. concerned with society as an ethical unit
2. measure outcomes in goods and bads 3. cost benefit analysis 4. ends justify the means |
|
Duty based ethics
|
1. individual
2. categorical imperative 3. rights and duties 4. the means will never justify the end` |
|
Theories which business ethics is based
|
1. Revealed Ethics
2. Kantian Ethics (categorical imperative) 3. Principle of Rights |
|
Revealed ethics
|
absolute to believers, elements of compassion
|
|
Principles of Rights
|
all individuals have rights and rights have corresponding duties
|
|
ADR
alternative dispute resolution |
1. Negotiation
2. Mediation 3. Arbritration -binding -non-binding |
|
Mediation
|
arites resolve dispute among themselves with help of nuetral 3rd party
|
|
Abritration
|
neutral 3rd party resolves a disprute
|
|
Non binding arbritration
|
parties dont have to agree with arbritrator
|
|
Binding Arbritration
|
parties have to agree with arbritrator
|
|
negotiation
|
parties resolved dispute among themselves
|
|
Law
|
enforceable rules governing society
|
|
Business Law
|
enforceable rules governing business
|
|
Trial Court
|
Facts and Law
1. Judge 2. Jury 3. Defendant 4. Plaintiff |
|
Appellate Court
|
Law only (no jury/evidence)
1.Judge 2. Plaintiff 3. Defendant |
|
Judge
|
enforces the law
|
|
Jury
|
weigh the facts and decide verdict
|
|
Plaintiff
|
person bringing forth the legal action
|
|
Defendant
|
person responding to the legal action
|
|
Federal Matters
|
immigration, tax, bankruptcy (feds only interested in big crimes)
|
|
State Matters
|
family and probate
|
|
tort
|
wrong against an individual
|
|
crime
|
wrong against society
|
|
2 categories of torts
|
Intentional and Unintentional
|
|
Intentional Torts
|
Property
Person |
|
Unintentional torts
|
Tort of Negligence
|
|
Negligence
|
Accidental harm caused by breach of duty
|
|
What is the purpose of Tort Law
|
To right a wrong
|
|
Reasonable Person's standard
|
hypothetical standard against which person's behavior in society is measured
|
|
4 qualities of a reasonable person
|
1. Careful
2. Conscientious 3. Dispassionate 4. Honest |
|
careful person
|
aware of surroundings and acts appropriately given their environment
|
|
Conscientious person
|
pays attention to their own actions and acts appropriately given their activity
|
|
Dispassionate person
|
places head before heart
|
|
Honest person
|
acts in accordance with the law and is free of deceit
|
|
Duty of Care
|
Party's obligation to behave reasonably in society
|
|
4 Questions of Negligence
|
1. Did defendant owe plaintiff duty of care?
2. Did defendant breach duty of care? 3. Was plaintiff harmed? 4. Was defendants ;breach the proximate cause of plaintiff's harm |
|
defense against a tort
|
reason why a defendant is not liable
|
|
Intellectual property
|
product of the creative process
|
|
3 Different groups of intellectual property
|
1. patents: software
2. copyright: photo 3. trademark: logo |
|
patent
|
exclusive right granted by government over and organizations design or process
|
|
copyrights
|
exclusive right granted by governent to the creator of writings, art and other similar property
|
|
trademark
|
exclusive right granted by government to logos, slogans and other similar property of commercial value
|
|
Differences between crimes and torts
|
1. Crime
-wrong against society -beyond a reasonable doubt - guilty/not guilty ($$, jail, death: losses of liberty) Tort: -wrong against individual -preponderance of evidence -liable or not liable (remedies at law/equity) |
|
Beyond a reasonable doubt (Crime)
|
burdern of proof in a criminal action by which the jury finds that there is no reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty
|
|
Preponderance of Evidence
(Tort) |
burden of proof in a civil action by which the jury concludes that it is more likley than not that the defendant is liable
|
|
2 elements of a crime
|
mens rea: wrongful state of mind
actus reas: overt illegal act |
|
4 elements of a contract
|
1. Agreement
2. Consideration 3. Capacity 4. Legality |
|
Agreement
|
offer and acceptance among parties
|
|
Consideration
|
that value which obligates the performance of a duty
|
|
Capacity
|
the ability to agree
|
|
Legality
|
the lawfullness of that purpose and form of a contract
|
|
Contract
|
enforceable agreement
|
|
Types of Contracts
|
unilateral/bilateral
expressed/implied formal/informal |
|
Unilateral and Bilateral Contract
|
Unilateral: value for a performance
Bilateral: value for a value |
|
Formal and Informal Contract
|
Formal: contract which requires a special form
Informal: contract which doesnt require a special form |
|
Implied and Expressed Contract
|
Implied: terms are understood
Expressed: terms are stated |
|
3rd party incidental beneficiaries
|
incedentially benefit was not reason contract was formed
|
|
3rd party intended beneficiary
|
intended by design to benefit from the contracts
|
|
3rd party
|
a person involved in a contract but not a party to the agreement
|
|
Article 2 of UCC
|
Sale of Goods
|
|
Article 2a of UCC
|
Lease of goods
|
|
Uniform Commercial Code
|
set of model laws which have been adopted in part or in whole by all 50 states whose purpose is to increase trade
|
|
UCC is good because
|
1. reduced uncertainty
2. increases transparency of the law 3. protects consumers by placing certain burdens on merchants 4. simplifies trade |
|
Duty of seller
|
tender conforming goods
|
|
Duty of buyer
|
accept and pay for conforming goods
|
|
Seller's Breach
|
-not tender
-send non-conforming goods |
|
Buyer's Breach
|
-not accept
-not pay |
|
Seller's Breach & Buyer's Remedies
|
Goods in:
Seller's possession -recover -s.p Buyer possession -damages -s.p In transit -damages s.p |
|
Buyer's Breach & Seller's Remedies
|
Goods in:
Sellers, Buyers, In Transit Possesion -damages -s.p |
|
Product Liability
|
strict liability applied to goods
|
|
Defense against product liability
|
reason why a merchant is not liable for a defective product
|
|
Implied warranty of title
|
understood guarantee that seller may transfer rights
|
|
Implied warranty of merchant ability
|
goods are reasonably fit for general purpose for which intended
|
|
implied warranty of fitness for a particular use
|
understood guarantee that a good will be reasonably fit for the specific performance specified by a buyer
|
|
expressed warranty
|
stated guarantee
|
|
limited warranty
|
limit sellers responsiblity or obligation
|
|
Implied warranty of title
|
understood guarantee that seller may transfer rights
|
|
Implied warranty of merchant ability
|
goods are reasonably fit for general purpose for which intended
|
|
implied warranty of fitness for a particular use
|
understood guarantee that a good will be reasonably fit for the specific performance specified by a buyer
|
|
expressed warranty
|
stated guarantee
|
|
limited warranty
|
limit sellers responsiblity or obligation
|
|
strict liability
|
liability without breach of duty
|
|
5 elements of product liability
|
1. seller is a merchant
2. goods must be in defective condition when bought/sold 3. product must be unreasonably dangerous 4. was the plaintiff harmed 5. was the defect by the defendant proximate cause of plaintiff's harm |
|
Article 3 of UCC
|
Negotiable Instruments
|
|
Negotiable Instruments
|
a written unconditional order or promise to pay an exact amount of money to a payee/ bearer payable upon demand signed by a drawor/maker
|
|
Negotiable Instruments
|
Orders to Pay:
-check -draft Promises to pay: -promisory notes -certificates of deposit |
|
promisory note
|
signed writing making unconditional promise to pay a bearer upon demand signed by a maker
|
|
Certificate of Deposits (CD)
|
promise to pay depositer a certain amount
|
|
Cashier's Check
|
only 2 parties are involved, same as cash
|
|
Certified Check
|
certified to payee that drawer has ready funds
|
|
bankruptcy
|
federal statutes that protect debtors from lenders
-discharges debtors from contractual duty |
|
What is the purpose of bankruptcy
|
let people continue to take risk
|
|
Chapter 7 bankruptcy
|
liquidation bankruptcy, either individual/corporation
-bankruptcy trustee calculates assets and debts, liquidate assets and pay off debts |
|
Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
|
reorganization or restructuring bankruptcy, only available to corporations
-trustee reorganizes debt |
|
Chapter 13
|
individual debt repayment plan
-trustee orders payment plans |
|
5 Categories of Crimes
|
Violent
Property Public Order White Collar Organized |
|
probable cause
|
government's reasonable belief based on evidence that wrongdoing has occured, will occur or is occuring
|
|
exclusionary rule
|
prevents illegally obtained evidence from being used in the court of law
|
|
3 common law requirements of an offer
|
communicated to the offeree
reasonable specificity objective intent |
|
privity of contract
|
contracts are just between the parties
|
|
contracts that must be in written form
|
land
sale of goods valued over $500 take more than 1 year to fulfill marriage collateral promises |
|
what is the most common way for a duty to be discharged
|
performance
|
|
specific performance SP
|
equitable remedy when first party seeks a court order for a second party to perform their duty
|
|
3 different types of crimes
|
felony
misdemeanor petty |
|
equitable principles and maxims
|
common law philosophies that introduce fairness and justice
|
|
Justice Theory questions
|
1. Is it Legal?
2. Is it balanced? 3. Who are the winner's and losers? 4. How does it make me feel about myself? |
|
Discovery
|
the process by which litigates gather information and evidence from one another
|
|
state jurisdiction
|
state may assert jurisdiction over property within its border
|
|
Inrem
|
property jurisdiction
|
|
Inpersonam
|
person "minimum contact"
est. by residence or significant activity |
|
Judicial review
|
Common Law Principle by which court interprets the law
|
|
example of statutory law
|
car insurance
|
|
long arm statute
|
state asserts jurisdiction over a non citizen
|
|
standing to sue
|
in order to sue another party plaintiff must have suffered a loss at stake
|
|
Example of constitutional law
|
Bill of rights
|
|
Example of administrative law
|
nutritional facts
|
|
Marbury v Madison
|
1803 established judicial review
J. Adams: 2nd president of US T. Jefferson: defeated Adams and was 3rd president of US J. Marshall:Adam's sec. of state and US SC Justice W. Marbury: strongly involved in politics supported Adams |
|
domain name
|
discreet location on the web- a url
|
|
Constitutional Safeguards to a crime
|
probable cause
exclusionary rule |
|
agreement
|
offer and acceptance among parties
|
|
lein
|
reduction in owner's rights
|
|
justifiable reliance
|
defense based on elements
|
|
proximate cause
|
direct unintervened cause of an outcome
|
|
compensetory damages
|
those losses resulting directly from a breach of duty
|
|
meta tags
|
information both visible and invisisble embedded in the url
|
|
capacity
|
parties ability to enter into an agreement
|
|
3 exceptions to capacity
|
1. intoxication
2. MI 3. infancy |
|
disaffirmance
|
process by which a minor can avoid a contractual duty
|
|
legality requirements
|
1. must NOT be contrary to statute
2. contrary to public policy |