• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/89

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

89 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Methods for classifying society
-technology
-ideology
-economy
-social organization
technology
-tools and knowledge for creating useful things
ideology
-way of viewing the world
-conceptual framework
economy
-method of subsistence
-way people gather materials that they need
social organization
-rules/customs that govern relationships between people
attribute
-used to help classify artifacts
-any observable, definable trait
-stylistic, morphological, technological
stylistic attributes
-easily observable aspects (color, shape, texture)
morphological attributes
-aspects that can be measured/quantified
-length, width, thickness
technological attributes
-raw materials and aspects of the manufacturing process
Purpose of classification
-creates order by dividing data into groups
-allows for comparison
-helps describe/quantify variety
-discuss objects in terms of "types" (represent sets of attributes)
Morgan & Tylor
-19th c.
-human groups by technology:
-savagery
-barbarism
-civilization
unilinear evolution
-concept: all societies pass through stages of evolution --> more advanced
-some get "stuck"
-cultural complexity=cultural worth
elam service
-classified society based on:
-size
-subsistence
-social organization
-band-tribe-chiefdom-state continuum
band
-20-50 members
-hunt/gather
-egalitarian
-mobile
-autonomous
-min material culture
-e.g. !Kung, Aborigines
tribe
-larger than band
-pastoral/horticultural
-nominal leader
-kinship; ceremony; territory
-e.g. Maasai
chiefdom
-tens of thousands
-agricultural
-formal authority
-ranked society; inequality
-specialists
-sacred places
-e.g. Zimbabwe, Mississippian
state
-large pop./territory
-agriculture and industry
-stratified hierarchy
-ruling elite
-full-time specialists
-laws, military, taxes
-e.g. Egypt
New Archaeology (Processual Arch)
-Patt Jo Watson
-through 1980s
-past can be known
-archaeologists can be objective
-scientific method
Post-Processual Archaeology
-Ian Hodder
-past is not objective
-past that we perceive is influenced and limited by our own cultural context/experiences
Gifford-Gonzales
-Real Flinstones: examines trends in representation of the past
-icons, motifs/schemata:
-skullery maid
-madonna w/child
-man the mighty hunter/noble
savage
-man in dynamic motion
icon
-evocative symbols that tell preexisting, gendered stories of heroism, motherhood, & societal roles to enculturated viewers
schemata/motif
-representations of objects, replicated from one form to another w/little variation in form
direct vs. indirect dating
-direct=based on object itself
-indirect=based on related/associated objects
strength of association
-degree of certainty that the objets you are indirectly dating are asoociated
Law of superposition
-lower layers of the soil represent older periods of time
Index Fossil Concept
-Will Smith (19th c.)
-strata of the same age will contain similar fossils
-helped relate layers between sites
Seriation Dating
-arranging objects into an order where adjacent objects are more alike than those farther apart
-basic principles:
-recognizable style
-changes in style are gradual
Stylistic seriation
-arranging artifacts into sequence based on shape/style
-e.g. petrie naqada: funerary jars from Egypt
frequency seriation
-determines sequence of deposits by examining frequency of certain types
-follows "battleship curve"
-e.g. Deetz, NE gravestones
Willard Libby
-studied cosmic radiation (high NRG neutrons collide to form isotopes)
-helped develop Carbon dating
Radiocarbon dating
-C13/C14 isotopes
-half life of C14 = 5730 years
-less C14 = older artifiact
-used for: plants, bones, charcoal, any part of C cycle
-300-100k ya
AMS dating
-Accel Mass Spec
-counts C14 atomes directly
-needs only very small sample
Limitations of Absolute Dating
-omits context
-dates are statistical
-"dating gap"
K/Ar dating
-half-life=1.3 billion years
-500,000 years is earliest
-must use volcanic rock
-large error
dating gap
-methods are limitied
-less accurate absolute dating information between 50k-500kya
analogical reasoing
-process by which identity of unknown things/relations is deduced using known things
-main form used by archaelogists
!Kung
-hunter-gatherer tribe in S.Africa
-mobile; egalitarian
-forced into reservations
-high rates of hunger, TB
-N!ai is criticized/gossiped about for working w/white people and not sharing enough
Dr. Kathleen Cook
-researching midwestern small towns during econ revitalization in 1980s/90s
-Green Hills & Southwood
-key terms:
-leveling behaviors
-norms
-coffee groups; gossip
Pliocene
-oldest geological period
- ~5 mya - 1.75 mya
Pleistocene
-geological period
- ~1.75 mya - 10 kya
Holocene
-latests geological period
- ~10kya
Archaeological Stages
-Lower Paleolithic: 2.6 mya-200 kya
-Middle Paleolithic: 200kya - 40kya
-Upper Paleolithic: 40kya - 10kya
-called Early/Middle/Late Stone Age in Sub-Saharan Africa
hominin
-humans and their ancestor (including australopiths)
Australopithecus
-early hominin genus of africa
-bipedal
-mixed human/ape teeth
-prognathus face
-post-cranial ~ human
bipedalism
-"beginning of human story"
-frees hands: carry objects/food
-allows long distance travel efficiently
-lessens thermal stress
Gracile Australopithecines
-slender form
-ape-like face; post-cranial~human
-A. Africanus
-A. Afarensis
-avg. cranial capacity ~450 cm^3
Hunting vs. Scavenging
-hunt smaller game
-scavenge larger game
-late access=partial skeletons, less meaty parts
-hunted remains=cuts on meaty bones, few carnivore marks
-scavenged=cuts on less meaty, more carnivore marks
Hunting + some scavenging theorists
-Leaky's
-Glynn Isaac --> "home-base"
-Manual Dominguez-Rodrigo
Savenging theorists
-Binford --> late access; marginal
-Henry Bunn --> early access
-Robert Bluemenshine --> Riparian scavenging
Riparian Scavenging
-analyzing cut/gnaw marks to distinguish between kills/scavenges
-determining what materials would remain in different situations
Home-base hypothesis
-Glynn Isaac
-based on central base foraging theory
-groups would return after gathering food/materials
-increased social connection, food sharing, drove stone tool production
Processing place theory
-Lewis Binford
-sites=places where food was processed
Stone cache hypothesis
-Potts
-sites=places where tools stored
Social activity hypothesis
-Marshall & Rose; Dominguez-R
-carnivore threat overrated
-engage in social activity w/tree coverings for retreat from carnivores
First signs of fire
-Kenya, 1.5mya: burned stone
-S.America, 1.3mya: burned bones
-Gesher ya'apov: tool production near fireplace
Lower Paleolithic
- ~5mya-200kya
- early humans(australo --> erectus)
- emergence of culture
- stone tool use/manufacture
- fire
Archaic Homo
- ~600k-200kya
- high morphological variation
- h. heidelbeorgensis
- persistence of homo erectus
- W Europe = Neanderthals
- Africa = H. sapiens
Morphology of Archaic Homo
-bigger skulls
-mosaic of primitive (h.erectus) and derived(h.sapiens) characters
-large, heavy face
Archaeological evidence of Arhcaic Homo
-intermittent activity sites
-scattered faun
-more fire evidence
-increased technology
-Boxgrove, England
-schoeningen spears (400kyo)
Neanderthals
-200k-40kya
-W. Eurasia
-Neander Valley, Germany
-Marchellin Boulle
Neanderthal Morphology
-wide nose, big front teeth, occipital bun, big brow ridge, projecting mid-face
-short,wide trunk/waist
-cold-adapted
-heavily muscled; esp. upper
Levallois technology
-Neanderthals show advanced stone tool production
-standardized flake production from prepared cores
Mousterian tool production
-more advanced stone tools
-different interpretations: Bordes, Binford, Dibble
Francois Bordes
-Different sets of beads/stone tools represent different ethnic groups or cultures
-1911
Lewis/Sally Binford
-1966
-differences in stone tools represent different site uses/seasonal uses
Dibble
-variety of stone tools results from continued modification/retouching of blades/flakes
Neanderthal hunting/diet
-skilled hunters --> massive kill sites
-high protein diet (from isotopes)
-microfossils/dental analysis show plant consumption/cooked foods
-diet shows wide variety depending on location
Neanderthal burials/symbolism
-lots of intentional burials
-perhaps unintentional grave goods
-some elaboration of burials
-shell beads
Middle Paleolithic
-200k-40kya
-variable environments
-glacial periods
-evolution of early h.sapiens/neanderthals from australo
-increased symbolism/burials
Upper Paleolithic
-rapid expansion out of Africa
-variable environments
-burials/art/symbolism
Phases of Upper Paleolithic
-Aurignacian: 34-27kya
-Gravettian: 27-21kya
-Solutrean: 21-16kya
-Magdalenian: 16-11kya
Aurignacian
-34-27kya
-advanced blades, composite tools
-osseus artifacts
-increased diet breadth
-art/symbolic work: shells, figures, cave art
Gravettian
-27-21kya
-"hunt-gath golden age"
-raw material diversity increase
-composite tools increase
-increased social connect/networks
-elaborate burials
-mobile w/structures
-venus figurines
Solutrean
-21-16kya
-throwing spears; intricate blades
-eyed needles --> clothing
Magdalenian
-16-11kya
-glacial period ends; people spread
-"reindeer people"
-cave art
Parietal Art
-cave art
-naturalistic, accurate animal depictions
-weird human/human+animal
-theory that some designs might mirror entoptic phenomena
-Lascaux, Chauvet
-"palimpsets" = painting over existing work
-Sympathetic magic, trophyism, sexual symbolism, info/communication
A. Africanus
-Raymond Dart (1924)
-Taung, S. Africa
- 3-2.2mya
A. Afarensis
-East African
-Donald Johanson (1973)
-Lucy; majority of skeleton
- 3-2.2 mya
Robust Australopithecines
-different genus: Paranthropus
-robust faces, jaws, teeth
-sagittal crest: bony ridge on skull, attaches chewing muscles
-A. Robustus & A. Boisei
A. Robustus
-S. Africa
-robust austral
- 2– 1mya
A. Boisei
-East Africa
-Mary Leaky found Zinjanthropus (1959)
-Olduvi gorge
- 2.2 mya
Laetoli
-Tanzania; discovered 1976
-showed footprints → indicating bipedals
Homo Habilis
-first of our species: ~2.4 mya
-bigger brain: 600-700 cc
-less ape-like: reduced dentition, rounded cranium, steeper forehead
-opposable thumb
-stone tool use/manufacture
-Gona River, Ethiopia; Olduvi; FxJj 50 (Koobi Fora, Kenya)
Sources of Analogy
-ethnographies
-historical sources
-actualistic studies
Ethnographies as source of Analogy
-limited by lack of time depth (only ~100 years old)
-limited by anthropological focus
Actualistic studies
-used to connect human behavior to material remains
-ethnoarchaeology: ethnography w/goal of understanding behavior → remains
-experimental archaeology: aid interpretation w/behavior duplication
Homo Erectus
-East Africa; 1.8 mya
-Nariokatome Boy found in W Lake Turkana, Africa
-evidence of hunting, plant use
Tool making skills
-knowledge of raw material
-strength, coordination
-understanding acute angles
Olduwan Stone tools
-Olduvi gorge
-earliest stone tools
-hammer stone
-bifacial chopper
-flake