Reading...
Play button
Play button
Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
2 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
- 3rd side (hint)
|
Wright v. Brown
|
Case dealing with a dog attack and Connecticut statute to constitute negligence per se.
1. How did court determine statutory purpose? |
Is Pmember of class leglislature sought to protect? Yes-statute protected "members of community" from being bitten by diseased dogs" Control of rabies not explicit. Class of persons not limited.
Harm suffered by P is type of harm leg. sought to protect. |
|
|
Ferrell V. Baxter (AK 1971)
|
Accident-ice-cross yellow line, truck v. car. Statute and negligence per se
Dissent: should be evidence of negligence rather than neg. per se |
|
