• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/15

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

15 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

McCulloch v Maryland 1819

established supremacy of the US Constitution and federal laws over state laws

United States v Lopez 1995

Congress may not use the commerce clause to make possession of a gun in a school zone a federal crime

Engel v Vitale 1962

School sponsorship of religious activities violates the establishment clause

Wisconsin v Yoder 1972

Compelling Amish students to attend school past the eight grade violates the free exercise clause

Tinker v Des Moines Independent Community School District 1969

public school students have the right to wear black armbands in school to protest the Vietnam War

New York Times Co. v United States 1971

Bolstered the freedom of the press, establishing a "heavy presumption against prior restraint" even in cases involving national security

Schenck v United States 1919

speech creating a "clear and present danger" is not protected by the first amendment

Gideon v Wainwright 1963

Guaranteed the right to an attorney for the poor or indigent in a state felony case

Roe v Wade 1973

Extend the right of privacy to a woman's decision to have an abortion

McDonald v Chicago 2010

The second amendment right to keep and bear arms for self-defense is applicable to the states

Brown v Board of Education 1954

Race-based school segregation violates the equal protection clause

Citizens United v Federal Election Commission 2010

political spending by corporations, associations, and labor unions is a form of protected speech under the First Amendment

Baker v Carr 1961

Opened the door to equal protection challenges to redistricting and the development of the "one person, one vote" doctrine by ruling that challenges to redistricting did not raise "political questions" that would keep federal courts from reviewing such challenges

shaw v reno 1993

majority minority districts, crated under the Voting Rights Act of 1965, may be constitutionally challenged by voters if race is the only factor used in creating the district

marbury v madison 1803

established the principle of judicial review empowering the Supreme Court to nullify an act of the legislative or executive branch that violates the Constitution