Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
71 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Argument
|
a group of statements, one or more of which
(called the premises) are intended to prove or support another statement (called the conclusion) |
|
Premises
|
Statements in an argument offered as evidence or reasons why we should accept another statement, the conclusion.
|
|
Conclusion
|
The statement in an argument that the premises are intended to prove or support.
|
|
Statement
|
A sentence that can be viewed as either true or false
|
|
Indicator Words
|
Words or phrases that provide clues that premises or conclusions are being put forward
|
|
Conditional Statement
|
An if-then statement, made of an antecedent and a consequent
|
|
Antecedent
|
The first part of a conditional statement that follows the word if
|
|
Consequent
|
The second part of a conditional statement that follows the word then
|
|
Explanation
|
Tries to show WHY something is the case, not to prove THAT it is the case
|
|
Chain argument
|
Multiple conditional statements linked together
|
|
Principle of Charity
|
Always give the speaker of writer the benefit of the doubt. never attribute to an arguer a weaker argument when the evidence reasonably permits us to attribute to him or her a stronger one.
|
|
Vagueness
|
meaning is fuzzy blurry or inexact
|
|
Overgenerality
|
the information provided is too broad and unspecific in a given context
|
|
Ambiguity
|
refers to a doubtful sense of a word or phrase.
|
|
Denotation
|
literal meaning
|
|
Connotation
|
the images or feelings that are associated with a word
|
|
dysphemism
|
harsh blunt or taboo words used to cause discomfort vie emotive force
|
|
euphemism
|
mild comforting or evasive words that take place of harsher words to produce a softening affect
|
|
Political Correctness
|
a term coined to indicate the almost ridiculous extremes to which some people have gone to avoid using language that might offend or insult
|
|
What are the two key questions that should be asked when evaluating an argument?
|
1. Are the premises true?
2. Do the premises provide good reasons to accept the conclusion? |
|
Deductive arguments
|
try to prove their conclusions with rigorous, inescapable logic. Guaranteed conclusions
|
|
Inductive arguments
|
try to show that their conclusions are plausible or likely given the premise. Likely conclusions
|
|
Syllogism
|
Three line argument. 2 premises and 1 conclusion.
|
|
Hypothetical syllogism
|
a syllogism that contains at least 1 conditional (if-then) statement as a premise
|
|
The form of a modus ponens argument
|
If A then B.
A. Therefore B. |
|
The form of a modus tollens argument
|
If A then B.
not B Therefore not A. |
|
Denying the antecedent form
|
If A then B.
not A. Therefore not B. |
|
Affirming the consequent form
|
If A then B.
B. Therefore A. |
|
Categorical Syllogism
|
each statement begins with all, some, or no
|
|
Argument by elimination aka Disjunctive syllogism
|
seeks to logically rule out various possibilities.
|
|
Disjunctive syllogism form aka argument by elimination
|
A or B A or B
not A not B therefore B therefore A |
|
Valid/Invalid and Sound/Unsound refer to
|
words we use to talk about Deduction
|
|
Strong/Weak and Cogent/Uncogent refer to
|
words we use to talk about Induction
|
|
Ad Hominem
|
when we reject someone's argument or claim by attacking the person rather than the person's argument or claim
|
|
Attacking the motive
|
the error of criticizing a person's motivation for offering a particular argument or claim
|
|
Tu Quoque
|
The fallacy committed when an arguer rejects another person's argument or claim because that person fails to practice what he preaches.
|
|
Two Wrongs Make a Right
|
the fallacy which occurs when an arguer attempts to justify a wrongful act by claiming that some other act is just as bad or worse.
|
|
Scare Tactics or Appeal to fear or ad baculum
|
Arguments that distract by making the audience afraid of the consequences of disagreeing with the speaker
|
|
Appeal to pity or ad miseriocordiam
|
Arguments that distract by making the audience feel sorry for the speaker or someone the speaker is speaking on behalf of
|
|
Bandwagon argument, Mob Appeal, or Ad populum
|
Arguments that distract by making the audience want to be popular, accepted, valued, or part of the crowd
|
|
Straw Man Fallacy
|
Arguments that attempt to disprove an opponents position by presenting it in an unfair, inaccurate light
|
|
Red Herring Fallacy
|
fallacy committed when an arguer tries to sidetrack the audience by raising an irrelevant issue and then claims that the original issue has effectively been settled by the irrelevant diverson
|
|
Equivocation
|
is committed when a key word is used in two or more senses in the same argument and the apparent success of the argument depends on the shift in meaning
|
|
Begging the Question
|
committed when an arguer states or assumes as a premise the very thing he or she is trying to prove as a conclusion.
|
|
inappropriate appeal to authority
|
is committed when an arguer cites a witness or authority who, there is good reason to believe, is unreliable
|
|
appeal to ignorance
|
occurs when an arguer asserts that a claim must be true because no one has proven it false, or conversely that a claim must be false because no one has proven it true
|
|
false alternatives or false dilemna
|
is committed when an arguer poses a false either/or choice
|
|
loaded question
|
occurs when an arguer asks a question that contains an unfair or unwarranted presupposition
|
|
Questionable Cause or Post Hoc
|
committed when an arguer assumes without adequate evidence that because one event (A) occurred before another event (B), A is the cause of B.
|
|
Hasty Generalization
|
Arguments that make a generalization on the basis of too few samples
|
|
Slippery Slope
|
occurs when we claim without sufficient evidence that a seemingly harmless action if taken will lead to a disastrous outcome
|
|
Weak Analogy
|
occurs when an arguer compares two or more things that aren't really comparable in relevant respects
|
|
Inconsistency
|
occurs when an arguer asserts inconsistent or contradictory claims
|
|
Non-sequitor
|
means does not follow
|
|
Line Drawing Fallacy AKA Fallacy of the beard
|
Not allowing for extremes because of gradations. Show me the line between . If you can't show me the clear line then the two extremes don't exist. Pornography and art and beard vs clean-shaven
|
|
Black and White Fallacy
|
says that there are only extremes and there are no gradations. Not allowing for gradations because of extremes
|
|
Special Case fallacy
|
when we take an unusual or special case and try to generalize it to all cases
|
|
Dicto Simpliciter fallacy
|
is applying a general rule to a special case
|
|
Composition as a fallacy .
|
says that what is true of the parts of something must be true of the whole- it illegitimately composes something. example: Because every tile is square floor must be square
|
|
Division as a fallacy
|
states that what is true of the whole must be true of the individual parts. Example: Movie is good/bad. Movie composed of parts.
|
|
Argument from outrage or Horselaugh
|
dismissing without any argument
|
|
Misplaced Burden of Proof
|
asking who has to make the argument in this debate? Who has the responsibility to make this case? The fallacy is the placing the burden of proof on the wrong person
|
|
Poisoning the Well
|
Trying to set up the argument in a bad light (a type of ad hominem)
|
|
Genetic Fallacy
|
made when somebody argues against a conclusion based on its origin. Arguing that something is false based on where the argument came from.
|
|
enthymeme
|
An argument with a missing premise or conclusion
|
|
inductive generalization
|
an argument that relies on characteristics of a sample population to make a claim about the population as a whole
|
|
Statistical Argument
|
argues from premises regarding a percentage of a population to a conclusion about an individual member of that population or some part of that population
|
|
Method of agreement
|
A common factor is present whenever the effect is present
|
|
Method of agreement
|
Everyone got sick. The only thing that everyone ate was oysters. So oysters were the cause.
|
|
Method of Difference
|
A factor is present when an effect occurs and absent on an otherwise similar occasion when it does not.
|
|
Method of Difference
|
You alone got sick. You alone at the oysters. So oysters were the cause.
|