Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
38 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Allegiance to manual is more related to outcomes than allegiance |
Heimberg, 1998 Kazdin, 1998 |
|
Some therapies show relative efficacy over others |
Shapiro & Shapiro, 1982 |
|
Absolute efficacy of therapy range .7-.85 |
Shapiro & Shapiro, 1982 Wampold, 2001 |
|
Absolute efficacy more important than relative efficacy |
APA, 2001 |
|
Common factors/allegiance account for more variance in outcomes than type of therapy |
Berman, Miller & Massman, 1985 |
|
Common factors account for 30-70% of variance |
Barley, 2002 Wampold, 2001 |
|
Therapy relationship accounts for outcomes as much as any particular measure |
Norcross, 2011 |
|
Client evaluation of therapeutic alliance is best predictor of outcome |
Hovarth et al., 2011 |
|
Manuals have not improved outcomes since they were introduced |
Lambert, 1998 |
|
ESTs may be incompatible with multicultural sensitivity |
Atkinson et al., 2001 |
|
Outcomes vary as a function of treatment provider, we should study what good therapists so |
Okiishi et al., 2006 |
|
Dodo bird conjecture |
Rozenzweig, 1936 |
|
Individual is slightly more effective than group therapy |
Dosh et al., 1983 Neitzel et al., 1987 |
|
Strong evidence that group and individual are equally effective |
Smith, Glass & Miller, 1980 |
|
Group is just as good as individual as long as process principles are used in group |
Burlingame, MacKenzie & Strauss, 2004 |
|
Group inclusion and exclusion criteria |
Yalom, 2005 |
|
Client expectations impact therapy outcomes |
Glencavage & Norcross, 1990 |
|
Therapists shape client expectations, which impacts outcomes |
Thomas, 1987 |
|
Paired samples t test |
Heppner et al., 2008 |
|
Chi square test |
Kerlinger & Lee, 2000 |
|
Internal and external validity in different types of studies |
Gelso, 1979 |
|
MAXMINCON |
Kerlinger, 1986 |
|
Holland model |
Holland, 1997 |
|
People pick majors/occupations congruent with Holland interests |
Betz et al., 2006 Gasser, Larson & Borgen, 2007 |
|
Individuals tens to choose congruent environments |
Betz, 2008 |
|
Congruence does not predict job or academic satisfaction |
Tranberg et al., 1993 |
|
Holland Interests hold up across ethnic groups in the US |
Day et al., 1998 |
|
Holland interests do not hold up internationally |
Tracy & Rounds, 1996 |
|
Social learning theory |
Bandura, 1986 |
|
SCCT |
Lent et al., 1994 |
|
Self efficacy predicts interest |
Rottinghaus et al., 2003 Lent et al., 2003 |
|
Interest may not relate to self efficacy |
Armstrong & Vogel, 2010 |
|
Self efficacy is a more powerful predictor of occupational consideration than P-E fit |
Gore & Leuwerke, 2000 |
|
Self efficacy predicts academic performance |
Multon, Brown & Lent, 1991 |
|
SCCT may not apply for ethnically diverse groups |
Fouad & Smith, 1996 |
|
Ethnic identity, acculturation and perceived barriers relate to self efficacy |
Flores et al., 2018 |
|
Robust evidence for mediating role of self efficacy in international pops |
Sheu & Borden, 2017 |
|
Interest and self efficacy separately explain a lot of career choice, together even more |
Donnay & Borgen, 1999 |