Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
18 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Factual Causation |
‘But for’ the defendants actions would the V have faced the same result? |
|
Factual causation CASE |
R v Pagett |
|
Legal Causation |
Were the Ds actions more than a minimal cause of death |
|
Legal causation CASE |
R v Kimsey |
|
Intervening acts |
Those which break the chain of causation |
|
Unreasonable actions of V |
Vs actions were unforeseeable by the D. - unreasonable |
|
Unreasonable actions of V |
Vs actions were unforeseeable by the D. - unreasonable |
|
Unreasonable actions of V- CASE |
R v Roberts |
|
Unreasonable actions of a 3rd party |
3rd party to crime act in unforeseeable manner to the D |
|
Unreasonable actions of a 3rd party |
3rd party to crime act in unforeseeable manner to the D |
|
Unreasonable actions of 3rd party- CASE |
Rafferty |
|
Unreasonable actions of a 3rd party |
3rd party to crime act in unforeseeable manner to the D |
|
Unreasonable actions of 3rd party- CASE |
Rafferty |
|
Palpably wrong medical treatment |
Medical treatment fell so far below the standards of care there was a risk of death |
|
Unreasonable actions of a 3rd party |
3rd party to crime act in unforeseeable manner to the D |
|
Unreasonable actions of 3rd party- CASE |
Rafferty |
|
Palpably wrong medical treatment |
Medical treatment fell so far below the standards of care there was a risk of death |
|
Palpably wrong medical treatment- CASE |
C |